Challenges of projectification in an engineering school
Lessons learned and room for improving the whole performance of the institution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22205298 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Claudette El Hajj (Notre Dame University – Louaize), Germán Martínez Montes (0000-0003-0677-8318, Universidad de Granada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 101487 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences & Humanities Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2590-2911 • E-ISSN: 2590-2911 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101487 |
| OpenAlex | W4409270230 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
The management model in higher education institutions is in continuous change: from an initial hierarchical and functional organization, the subsequent influence of the New Public Management model and more recently project-based management, conditioned among other causes by how a large part of the financing of universities (programs and projects) is being articulated. This management model affects all the activities carried out by universities, particularly teaching and research, as well as the way staff must perform their functions. Like all models, project-oriented management has its opportunities and challenges. This paper examines the implications of project-based learning in the university environment. To explore this topic, the authors conducted a case study involving an engineering school in the Middle East and developed semi-structured interviews. This approach allowed the examination of how academic professionals perceive the increasing trend of projectification across six areas: Teaching and Curriculum, Research and Funding, Doctoral Studies, Administration and Governance, Academic Professional Development, and the overall University Culture. The results reveal that, although projectification benefits the institution in general, it is accompanied by a series of negative implications that affect both individuals and the management. The complexity and the different missions and values of universities highlight the need for a nuanced approach to project management to optimize management without jeopardizing academic excellence, especially in the field of teaching and research. Academic staff is not exempt from the need for permanent training, and it is necessary to incorporate project management and its principles to capacity-building programs to ensure their best performance. • Academic practitioners see projectification as a risk to funding and groundbreaking research output. • Understanding the key role of the time is essential in order to implement a successful projectification of the University. • The evolving nature of academic projects demands a nuanced approach to project management in research environments. • To face projectification challenges, universities must prioritize strategic planning and fair resource distribution
Engineering ethics · Engineering management · Institution · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Engineering Education and Curriculum Development · Higher Education and Employability · Higher Education Learning Practices
Research Methods in Education
Research and scholarly methods
The projectification of the university
Creativity in Project Management Teaching
Writing Narrative Literature Reviews
Projectification of Doctoral Training? How Research Fields Respond to a New Funding Regime
Reflexive methodology
A Public Management for All Seasons
Re/conceptualising time and temporality
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |