Bureaucratic Initiative in Capitalist New Zealand
A Case Study of the Accident Compensation Act of 1972
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2221528 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pat Shannon (0009-0003-6641-3115, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Pages | S154-S175 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9602 • E-ISSN: 1537-5390 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/649255 |
| OpenAlex | W2037170477 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
New Zealand's position in the world economic order and the form of its state determine the limits and possibilities of state initiative. One such initiative-the Accident Compensation Act of 1972-has been something of a revolution in social policy, as it abolished the whole field of tort law with respect to accident injury, covers all accident-related costs for all citizens, and provides earnings-related compensation for all earnings lost. The paper analyzes how the act, first framed in the interests of monopoly capital, was reshaped through struggles both outside and within the state
Accident (philosophy) · Bureaucracy · Business · Capital (architecture) · Compensation (psychology) · Earnings · Economics · Industrial Accident · Law and economics · Liability · Market economy · Monopoly · Order (exchange) · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · State (computer science) · Tort · Finance · Labor Movements and Unions · Law
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1997 - 1997 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |