Suspended Affixation needs no morphological word

The suffix -(y)Ip

Bibliographic Data

ID22224082
AuthorsFurkan Atmaca (0000-0003-4248-7059, Leipzig University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume6
Issue1
Pages5035
Publication date2021-12-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueProceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2641-3485 • E-ISSN: 2641-3485
PublisherLinguistic Society of America (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3765/ptu.v6i1.5035
OpenAlexW4206718549
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

I re-evaluate the morphological word constraint for suspended affixation(SA) in Turkish (Kabak 2007). I argue that SA, as an operation, is not bound by the morphological word constraint. What is constrained is the exponent insertion and SA takes place before it. SA is a morphological ellipsis taking place in conjunctions. After suspension, conjunction peripheral affixes are interpreted for all the conjuncts. The morphological word constraint in Turkish is related to SA in verbals, and it defines the limit of suspendability for an affix. This limit is defined by Kabak to be the morphological word. What is left of the conjunct after suspension should be a morphological word, otherwise the derivation is ungrammatical. To show that this is not the case, I propose a different analysis for the suffix -(y)Ip and provide empirical points for its relation to SA

Affix · Geometry · Linguistics · Prefix · Suffix · Word formation · Computer Science · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access