Linking research, education and citizen codesign
Compact cities as social intensification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22229979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jenny Stenberg (0000-0002-1868-4362, University of Gothenburg), Liane Thuvander (0000-0002-9031-4323, Chalmers University of Technology, corresponding author), Jaan-Henrik Kain (0000-0001-8838-099X, University of Gothenburg), Marco Adelfio (0000-0003-1865-9471, Chalmers University of Technology) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SN Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9283 • E-ISSN: 2662-9283 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s43545-021-00257-9 |
| OpenAlex | W3202609615 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 13 |
Both research and policy argue for more compact cities, but there is little clarity regarding which urban qualities must be made more compact to achieve the purported benefits. This paper discusses an example of how to conduct immersive and localised studies by connecting research and education to community outreach. Three potential positive outcomes of linking are examined: (a) linking may improve research activities, (b) linking may have a positive impact on student learning, and (c) better valorisation of research results may be achieved. Within a master’s course, architectural students used codesign methods to investigate how the compact city concept can be understood and applied at the neighbourhood level; this assignment was formulated within a research project. The researchers performed observations and feedback tutorials, and the students applied mixed methods, including a literature review, meetings with researchers and stakeholders, site analysis, interviews and a pop-up workshop with residents, strategy development, design proposals, and feedback meetings with critics and local stakeholders. The results show that this linking may contribute significantly to research activities, as the results of a collaborative process between students and local residents were noteworthy. Rather than focusing on the physical environment, the residents argued that the starting point for urban development should be the social aspects. The residents helped the students understand what social aspects to focus on and how to think about certain locations. In terms of education, the collaboration gave students access to the latest research. Better valorisation of research results was achieved with actors at the local level. However, higher up in the municipal hierarchy, valorisation remained a challenge. Linking research and education to community outreach is not particularly common, even if linking all three activities has the potential to lead to systemic change
CLARITY · Higher education · Outreach · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Educational Environments and Student Outcomes · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Psychology · Urban Green Space and Health
Growing Cities Sustainably
Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods
The Compact City Fallacy
Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women’s participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment
Engaging the City
University-Community Partnership Centers
Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |