Earthquake conspiracy discussion on Twitter
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22230506 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dmitry Erokhin (0000-0002-5191-0579, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, corresponding author), Nadejda Komendantova (0000-0003-2568-6179, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-024-02957-y |
| OpenAlex | W4393235576 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
Natural disasters like earthquakes, and global crises like pandemics have historically captured the public’s imagination and prompted people to seek explanations. However, in times of limited information, these explanations can take the form of conspiracy theories, particularly regarding the origins or causes of such events. With the advent of social media conspiracy theories can spread quickly and easily, leaving little room for critical thinking. The focus of this study is the analysis of the so-called High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) conspiracy, which explains earthquakes through the employment of secret weather control weapons. This study aims to answer the research question of how the discourse on the HAARP conspiracy theory changes over time, and what are the potential catalysts for heightened attention to this conspiracy theory. This study uses the Twitter API to collect tweet frequencies about this conspiracy from January 2022 through March 2023. The empirical data include over one million tweets on HAARP. The sentiment analysis of the HAARP conspiracy theory is applied to the tweets before, during, and after the 6th of February 2023 earthquake in Syria and Turkey. In addition, this study investigates possible triggers of the development of the HAARP tweet frequency. This study finds that the frequency of HAARP discussion increases following a high-impact earthquake. There is also a positive correlation between average tweet sentiment and the number of tweets, which could indicate that the discussion of HAARP reinforces people’s beliefs. This study makes a significant contribution to the field of social psychology and communication by providing insights into the dynamics of belief reinforcement within online communities amidst heightened attention to conspiracy theories triggered by significant events. This knowledge has broader implications for understanding the impact of social media on public perception during crises
Seismology · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · History · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Geology
Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
An epidemic of uncertainty
Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Time windows of opportunities to fight earthquake under-insurance
Data-driven modeling reveals the Western dominance of global public interest in earthquakes
A social bot in support of crisis communication
The role of bots in spreading conspiracies
Social media skepticism and belief in conspiracy theories about Covid-19
A systematic review of narrative interventions
Conspiracy Theories in Turkey
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Why do people believe Covid-19 conspiracy theories
PTSD, Fomo and fake news beliefs
Misinformation and Its Impact on Contested Policy Issues
Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories Discussion on Twitter
Information and misinformation about climate change
Does the platform matter? Social media and Covid-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries
Suspicious binds
Making an impression
Christian Nationalism and Political Violence
Conspiracy theories as part of history
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Locating and applying sociological theories of risk-taking to develop public health interventions for adolescents
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |