Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Determinants of university students’ attitudes towards smart devices in the smart campus environment

Bibliographic Data

ID22230804
AuthorsBingling Wei (0000-0003-2222-7516, Shenzhen Technology University), Yuefan Zhuo (Shenzhen Technology University, corresponding author), Huiqi Zeng (Shenzhen Technology University), Huijia Hong (Shenzhen Technology University), Hang Liu (0000-0002-0801-6897, South China Agricultural University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue1
Publication date2025-09-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-025-05853-1
OpenAlexW4414662229
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited96

Considering the rapid advancement of information and communication technology, smart campuses represent a significant evolution of digital campus, integrating intelligent technologies to enhance educational quality, resource allocation, and management efficiency. However, the factors influencing university students’ comprehensive experiences and perceptions of smart devices usage within the broader, integrated smart campus environment remain insufficiently understood. Addressing this gap, the present study integrates the technology acceptance model with the task-technology fit theory and perceived risk theory to investigate the factors influencing university students’ attitudes toward using smart devices (ATT) in the smart campus environment. The results from a sample of 428 Chinese university students obtained using partial least squares structural equation modeling reveal that perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), and information security significantly influence students’ ATT, whereas learning support and perceived interactivity exert indirect effects on ATT through PU and PEU. This study deepens the understanding of technology acceptance in highly technology-integrated smart campus environments, advances human-centered research on the smart campus, and provides practical insights to facilitate the effective implementation and broader adoption of smart devices on a smart campus, thereby supporting the sustainable development of higher education

Interactivity · Perception · Risk perception · Smart device · Smart environment · Structural equation modeling · Technology Acceptance Model · Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology · Usability · Education and Learning Interventions · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Technostress in Professional Settings

  • Smart campus

    Open Access•Lama Nael Mansour Hammouri, Musllam Alrosan et al.•Research Journal in Advanced…•2026

  • Shaping the Future of Smart Campuses

    Open Access•Omar S Asfour, Omar E Al-Mahdy•Urban Science•2026

  • Understanding the role of digital technologies in education

    Open Access•Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid et al.•Sustainable Operations and…•2022

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)

    Marko Sarstedt, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of Family Business Strategy•2014

  • Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment

    Open Access•Kaili LU, Harrison Hao Yang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers

    Open Access•Chengming Zhang, Jessica Schießl et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)

    Adrian Leguina•International Journal of Research…•2015

  • “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”

    Open Access•Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, Na Li et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, Jeffrey J Risher et al.•European Business Review•2019

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Strategic framework and global trends of national smart education policies

    Open Access•Junfeng Yang, Yao Sun et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities

    Open Access•Rouye Pan, Zihan Qin et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • The effects of the expectation confirmation model (ECM) and the technology acceptance model (TAM) on learning management systems (LMS) in sub-saharan Africa

    Yaser Hasan Al‐Mamary, Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Predicting the actual use of m-learning systems

    Muhammad Turki Alshurideh, Barween Al Kurdi et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Acceptance of educational use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the context of individual innovativeness and ICT competency of pre-service teachers

    Şahin Gökçearslan, Hatice Yıldız Durak et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation

    Open Access•Yen-Fen Lee, Gwo-Jen Hwang et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2022

  • Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism

    Open Access•Naveed Saif, Sajid Ullah Khan et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Revisiting the relationship between smartphone use and academic performance

    Open Access•Yanqing Lin, Liu Yong et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment

    Open Access•Jingxian Wang, Dineke E H Tigelaar et al.•Computers & Education•2022

  • Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses

    Open Access•Xiaomei Wei, Nadira Saab et al.•Computers & Education•2021

  • A model for assessing student satisfaction with smart classroom environment in higher education

    Open Access•Zhicheng Dai, Ling Wang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2024

  • Smart campus—A sketch

    Open Access•Nasro Min-Allah, Saleh Alrashed•Sustainable Cities and Society•2020

  • Developing the rotational synchronous teaching (RST) model

    Open Access•Yanhong Lee, Harrison Hao Yang et al.•Australasian Journal of…•2019

  • Smart campus communication, Internet of Things, and data governance

    Open Access•Pauline Hope Cheong, Pratik Nyaupane•Big Data & Society•2022

  • Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education

    Open Access•Khaled M S Faqih, Mohammed-Issa Riad Mousa Jaradat•Technology in Society•2021

  • Remote learning via video conferencing technologies

    Open Access•Mark Anthony Camilleri, Adriana Caterina Camilleri•Technology in Society•2022

  • Are students ready for robots in higher education? Examining the adoption of robots by integrating UTAUT2 and TTF using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach

    Open Access•Faisal Suhail, Mouhand Adel et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • Towards a conceptual model for examining the impact of knowledge management factors on mobile learning acceptance

    Open Access•Mostafa Al-Emran, Vitaliy Mezhuyev et al.•Technology in Society•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae