A Great Divide
Polish media discourse on migration, 2015–2018
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22232249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marek Troszyński (0000-0002-3653-4018, Collegium Civitas, corresponding author), Magdalena El Ghamari (0000-0001-5798-7545, Collegium Civitas) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-021-01027-x |
| OpenAlex | W4206982896 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 44 |
The widely described migration crisis in Europe took place in 2015–2018. Like any major event, it was covered by the media in a variety of ways. While one could find analyses of the related media content for many European countries, a comprehensive study for Poland has not been previously conducted. This paper describes the Polish media’s divided positions on migration from 2015 to 2018. The media content analysis was based on the monitoring of the press, television, and the Internet. The following research techniques were used: (1) a summary of the number of messages over particular months to show the intensity of the phenomenon, (2) quantitative analysis employing corpus linguistics (CL), (3) qualitative analysis using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The analyses revealed a sharp divide between conservative and liberal discourses. These differences—tone, sentiment, and subject matter—were apparent in how the migration crisis was described. Conservative media only showed negative aspects of migration, and if there were no such issues in Poland, protests against migrants in Europe became their chosen topic. Liberal media much more often referred to the specificity of migration to Poland (economic migration from Ukraine) and showed the need for solidarity with migrants. However, the dominant difference was the political sympathies of individual media. We have shown divisions in media coverage based on this very factor. Tabloid coverage was not associated with any political party; it criticized the actions of the government and the opposition. However, the most critical perspective from which we want to describe the collected material is the securitization of migration. The subject of security is present in each analysed discourse, regardless of political divisions. Our research shows though that the intensity of threats is more significant in the right-wing press
Content analysis · Media studies · Phenomenon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Solidarity · European Politics and Security · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Media discourses of migration
Female, Deserving, and European? The Changing EUropean Migration Discourse in the Face of the Russia–Ukraine War
The Dynamics of Social Networks Among Muslim Students in Kraków
Framing the Polish-Belarusian Border in 2021. The Case of Public Service Television (TVP)
Uchodźcy z Ukrainy w prywatnych dyskursach osób goszczących ich w swoich domach
Attitudes towards migrants and preferences for asylum and refugee policies before and during russian invasion of ukraine
Deserving of Assistance
Criminalization of occupation
The making of a president, the making of an opponent
Securitising the future
Unwanted guests” or welcomed neighbors? Portrayals of Ukrainian refugees in Russian, Polish, and UK news coverage
Frames and arguments on the admission of refugees
A flood of illegal immigrants or a humanitarian crisis provoked by the government - A comparative mixed-methods analysis of framing strategies of Poland's two leading media outlets
Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis
The Hybrid Media System
Corpora in Applied Linguistics
Querying Keywords
Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding
Discourse and Discrimination
Politics in Time
When two become one
The echo chamber is overstated
Red Media, Blue Media
Media accountability meets media polarisation
Images of Immigrants and Refugees
The Securitization of Migration
Security
Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve
The Politics of Insecurity
The European media discourse on immigration and its effects
Information Flow in the 21st Century
Why Are “Others” So Polarized? Perceived Political Polarization and Media Use in 10 Countries
Agents without agency
Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures
Theories and concepts in critical discourse studies
Some have Credit Cards and others have Giro Cheques
Prejudice-relevant Correlates of Attitudes towards Refugees
Framing Effect of Media Portrayal of Migrants to the European Union
Immigration and national identity
What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration
Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis
Routine Reliance Revisited
The Three Faces of Securitization
Towards a Theory of Securitization
Security and Immigration
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics
Mining large corpora for social information
Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |