Dynamic interplay in biomass fuel technological innovation
A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22233334 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yigang Wei (0000-0001-6190-2241, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control), Yuanyuan Shao (0000-0002-2399-4031, Renmin University of China), Xiaoliang Yang (0000-0003-4579-322X, Beihang University), Keming Zheng (Beihang University), Lupeng Zhang (0000-0002-2266-8584, Beihang University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-025-05959-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4416093265 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 66 |
Biomass fuel provides a sustainable alternative for global energy needs. The process of technological innovation in biomass fuel involves numerous stakeholders. This paper examines how to balance the interests and powers of various stakeholders to foster innovation in biomass fuel technology. Focusing on the power industry, we explore the behavioral evolution and characteristics of strategic choices and interplay under various scenarios. Our findings indicate: Firstly, technology developers’ investment in biomass fuel technology exhibits a ‘threshold effect’, where initial investment promotes innovation up to a certain point, beyond which further investment yields diminishing returns and reduces their willingness to invest. Second, government green subsidies to technology developers encourage research institutes to engage in biomass fuel technology innovation. Third, high opportunity costs and risks discourage electric power companies and research institutes from pursuing biomass fuel innovation. These insights can help improve biomass fuel innovation and guide government policies
Biofuel · Electricity generation · Energy policy · Renewable energy · Subsidy · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Capital Investment and Risk Analysis · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Stakeholder Theory
Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?
Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models
The evolutionary mechanism of haze collaborative governance
Understanding the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry
Coevolution mechanisms of stakeholder strategies in the green building technologies innovation ecosystem
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |