Mind the gap! On the future of AI research

Bibliographic Data

ID22233903
AuthorsEmma Dahlin (0000-0002-3885-5915, Linköping University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume8
Issue1
Publication date2021-03-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-021-00750-9
OpenAlexW3137220143
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited24

Research on AI tends to analytically separate technical and social issues, viewing AI first as a technical object that only later, after it has been implemented, may have social consequences. This commentary paper discusses how some of the challenges of AI research relate to the gap between technological and social analyses, and it proposes steps ahead for how to practically achieve prosperous collaborations for future AI research. The discussion draws upon three examples to illustrate the analytical gap in different phases of the development of AI systems. Attending to the planning phase, the first example highlights the risk of oversimplifying the task for an AI system by not incorporating a social analysis at the outset of the development. The second example illuminates the issue of system acceptance, where the paper elaborates on why acceptance is multifaceted and need not be approached as merely a technical problem. With the third example, the paper notes that AI systems may change a practice, suggesting that a continuous analysis of such changes is necessary for projects to maintain relevance as well as to consider the broader impact of the developed technology. The paper argues that systematic and substantial social analyses should be integral to AI development. Exploring the connections between an AI’s technical design and its social implications is key to ensuring feasible and sustainable AI systems that benefit society. The paper calls for further multi-disciplinary research initiatives that explore new ways to close the analytical gap between technical and social approaches to AI

Data science · Discipline · Engineering ethics · Knowledge management · Management science · Political science · Process management · Social science · Sociology · Systems engineering · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access