Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22236712 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kiran Pala (0000-0002-4310-2694, University of Eastern Finland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-023-02363-w |
| OpenAlex | W4389224637 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This essay delves into the essentialities of object-giving sources within the formulation of epistemic objectivity. It explores the relationship between objectivity and intentional states, particularly in the context of immediate and transcendent experiences. A key focus of this paradigm is the examination of inferences and how they are held in X’s intentional processes. These claims about inferences contribute to the perception of objectivity by highlighting the epistemological transitions of things that occur in the constitutive ideation. Additionally, the activity within X’s episteme leads to significant articulations that reflect a structural realism of experiences. The essay also introduces a convention of the experiential-intentional process so that the causality manipulations could be avoided by the precents of sources of ideation. In this instance, the central niche is occupied by transcendental reflections of intentionality, which are fundamentally founded on experiences and objectivity, and they possess a distinct rhetorical quality. They manifest as acts, propositional forms, and constituents, all of which contribute to the understanding and justification of objectivity. To establish such a framework that upholds objectivity, certain prerequisites must be met. Firstly, the framework must possess justificational resources that prevent causality manipulations. Secondly, pre-reflective sources should not inter-define causality in epistemic circumstances, although this does not exclude the emergence of causal relations, and thus this approach offers a correlational explanation. Lastly, transcendental reflections should remain compatible with the experiential-intentional process, allowing for the accommodation of subjectivity in the justification of objectivity
Epistemology · Experiential learning · Intentionality · Rhetorical question · Subjectivity · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
Knowledge and the flow of information
Cartesian Meditations
Fear of Knowledge
Beyond "Justification"
The Shorter Logical Investigations
The Phenomenological Mind
Consciousness and its Objects
Identity, doxastic co-indexation, and Frege’s puzzle
Husserl’s theory of noematic sense
Prospects of enactivist approaches to intentionality and cognition
The `Object' in Husserl's Phenomenology
Husserl’s Noetics – Towards a Phenomenological Epistemology
A Controversy Over the Existence of Fictional Objects
Husserl’s Theory of Signitive and Empty Intentions in Logical Investigations and its Revisions
Doing Phenomenological Research and Writing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |