Writing Futures
An Anthropologist’s View of Global Scenarios
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2224693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulf Hannerz (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 797-818 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-3204 • E-ISSN: 1537-5382 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/684070 |
| OpenAlex | W2346190831 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 72 |
Toward the end of the twentieth century, the Cold War ended, and "globalization" became a key word in public discourse. In the new situation people could ask, with relief or anxiety, what might happen next. So a small but lively intellectual industry rose to the challenge, creating scenarios for a born-again world. As the world turned, there would be more of them. With 9/11 there was another wave of global commentary. There were hot wars in Central Asia and the Middle East, and then, with economic upheavals spreading rather unevenly over the world, there were shifts in the global centers of gravity. This again generated more scenarios for the world. Often, the future visions could be encapsulated in striking catchphrases: "the end of history," "the clash of civilizations," "jihad versus McWorld," "soft power," and others. The Eric Wolf Lecture of 2014 scrutinizes world scenarios as a genre of creative writing but also considers their role as a set of representations of the world that are now circulated, received, and debated in a worldwide web of social relationships. As a contemporary sociocultural phenomenon, the scenarios come out of a zone of knowledge production where academia, media, and politics meet. The authors are "global public intellectuals." While anthropology has contributed little to them directly, these writings deserve attention for the way they offer the "Big Picture" of the world and, at times, for their use of cultural understandings
Art · End of history · Futures contract · Globalization · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Vision · World community · World history · World literature · World War II · World-system · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · History · Law · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword
The End of the Peace Process
Who are we?
Anthropology's World
The Culture of Connectivity
ReOrient
Der Untergang des Abendlandes
Europe and the people without history
Modernity at large
Reinventing anthropology.
Identity and violence
Cultural Complexity
Ethnicity and Nationalism
A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays
Transnational Connections
Anthropology, by Comparison
The “McDonaldization” of Society
The Clash of Civilizations
Postcolonial Melancholia
Nations Unbound
Globalization
Branding the Nation
The Benefit of Broad Horizons
Debate
Patterns of Culture
Friction
The Modern World-System I
Reflections on varieties of culturespeak
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
Talking Culture
Soft power
The modern world-system
Social Theory and Social Structure
The Limits to Growth
The Next 200 Years
Capital, Not Culture
The Clash of Civilizations
Scenarios for the Twenty-first Century World
Words of the world
Culture
A conversation with Eric Wolf
Totems and Teachers
The Passion of Franz Boas
The Future of Anthropology
Distinguished Lecture
Access
Diversity Is Our Business
Macro-scenarios. Anthropology and the debate over contemporary and future worlds
True life, real lives
The Climate of History
Writing for Culture
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,71 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |