Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Does the Adversarial System Truly Deliver Justice in South Africa? A Critical Analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22257035
AutoresNtsika Qakaza (0009-0009-4035-2098, Walter Sisulu University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen6
Número14
Páginas3873
Fecha de publicación2025-12-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaE-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2720-7722 • E-ISSN: 2720-7722
EditorialNoyam Publishers (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.38159/ehass.202561435
OpenAlexW7119522679
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas9

A pillar of South Africa’s legal system, the adversarial system places a strong emphasis on party-driven litigation in which competing parties argue their positions before an impartial judge. Critics contend that this system may put procedural wins ahead of substantive justice, despite its intention to guarantee fairness through vigorous debate. The effectiveness of the adversarial approach in delivering justice in South Africa is critically examined in this paper, as is whether its emphasis on competitive legal strategies compromises truth-seeking and equitable outcomes. This paper critically examines whether South Africa’s adversarial legal system delivers substantive justice or merely procedural fairness. Drawing on case law, comparative jurisprudence, and scholarly analysis, it explores how disparities in legal representation, procedural delays, and adversarial tactics impact truth-seeking and equitable outcomes. Using high-profile trials such as those of Senzo Meyiwa and Timothy Omotoso, the study highlights systemic flaws and proposes reforms, including judicial intervention and hybrid procedural models. The findings suggest that while the adversarial system upholds formal fairness, it often fails to meet the constitutional promise of substantive justice. The study examines important issues, including the impact of differences in legal representation, deliberate manipulation of evidence, and the system’s ability to resolve systemic inequities, by examining case law, procedural dynamics, and comparative viewpoints

Adversarial system · Economic Justice · Legal culture · Procedural justice · Procedural law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Land Rights and Reforms · Legal Issues in South Africa

  • Abuse, power and discourse in the public trial of Timothy Omotoso

    Open Access•Mookgo Solomon Kgatle, Maria Frahm‐arp•Verbum et Ecclesia•2022

  • All of Us Are Vulnerable, But Some Are More Vulnerable than Others

    Alyson Cole•Critical Horizons•2016

  • Factors Associated With Rape Case Attrition in the South African Criminal Justice System

    Open Access•Mercilene Machisa, Ruxana Jina et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2023

  • The German Advantage in Civil Procedure

    John H Langbein•The University of Chicago Law…•1985

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae