Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

States Cooperation in Arresting Senior State Officials and Sitting Heads of State under International Criminal Law

Quo Vadis ICC

Bibliographic Data

ID22257330
AuthorsPaul S Masumbe (0000-0002-9997-4125, Walter Sisulu University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Pages1493-1500
Publication date2023-12-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueE-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2720-7722 • E-ISSN: 2720-7722
PublisherNoyam Publishers (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.38159/ehass.20234138
OpenAlexW4389920153
LanguageEN
References cited22

Albeit the Rome Statute does not recognise the immunity of incumbent presidents before the International Criminal Court (ICC), prosecuting sitting presidents of non-parties states has become a debacle. Accordingly, despite the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa and the Pre-Trial Chamber II of the ICC against non-compliance of South Africa and Jordan respectively in the arrest of Al Bashir as the serving President of Sudan, Al Bashir has never been tried even now as a former president because no state is willing to arrest and surrender him. The main defence for not cooperating with the Court is that the serving president, especially of non-states parties still enjoys immunity recognised by customary international law. Accordingly, while Article 27 of the Rome Statute is not applicable to non-state parties as argued by these states, Article 98 is applicable even though these arguments have been categorically rebutted by the Court. Consequently, since the Al Bashir case remains a prototype for state cooperation and the prosecution of serving heads of state before the ICC, this might become the fate of Vladimir Putin as serving head of state of the Russian Federation. This article used qualitative research methods and argues that without state cooperation in matters of arrest and surrender of sitting heads of state and other senior state officials to the ICC, the court’s effort to realise justice for crimes against humanity will remain largely unsuccessful under international criminal law. Keywords: State cooperation, Putin’s arrest warrant, Al Bashir case, International Criminal Court, non-state parties to the Rome Statute

Appeal · International law · Political science · Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court · Sanctions · State immunity · Statute · Statute of limitations · Surrender · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Legal Studies and Policies

  • The Immunity of Heads of States of Nonparties in the Early Years of the ICC

    Open Access•Dapo Akande•AJIL Unbound•2018

  • Immunities and International Crimes before the ILC

    Open Access•Mathias Forteau•AJIL Unbound•2018

  • Will the International Criminal Court (icc) Be Able to Secure the Arrest of Vladimir Putin When He Travels

    Jeremy Sarkin•International Human Rights Law…•2023

  • Head of State Immunity and the Rome Statute

    Michael Ramsden, Isaac Yeung•International Criminal Law Review•2016

  • The Draft Articles on Crimes Against Humanity and Immunities of State Officials

    Open Access•Micaela Frulli•Journal of International Criminal…•2018

  • Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest

    Paola Gaeta•Journal of International Criminal…•2009

  • Ratione Materiae Immunities of Former Heads of State and International Crimes

    Piero Gaeta•Journal of International Criminal…•2003

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae