“A Sick Way of Thinking?”
The Unorthodox Dramaturgy of Young Jean Lee’s Identity Politics Theater
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22265482 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Io Chun Kong (0000-0001-6845-7486, City University of Macau, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 14-27 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Akda The Asian Journal of Literature Culture Performance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2782-8875 • E-ISSN: 2782-8875 |
| Publisher | De La Salle University (PUBLISHER • PH) |
| DOI | 10.59588/2782-8875.1012 |
| OpenAlex | W4385510549 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
The article addresses the predicament of what I refer to as “racial contingency” in Asian American theater and how such conception draws critical attention to the naturalizing of neoliberal multiculturalism. Utilizing “racial contingency” as a critical lens to examine the emerging wave of Asian American artists, this essay explores Young Jean Lee’s identity politics theater as a counter-ideological project that responds to neoliberal multiculturalism. It aims to explore her “unorthodox” dramaturgy as critical aesthetic embodied in her latest Broadway success, Straight White Men (2015), which expresses (quoting her own line) “a sick way of thinking” that is deemed as both a symptom and a critique of racial contingency in neoliberal multiculturalism. By demonstrating the ways in which racial subjects have become racially contingent in Asian American theater, the essay argues that Young Jean Lee’s identity politics theater generates from while also responding to the rhetoric of neoliberal multiculturalism
Aesthetics · Art · Contingency · Dramaturgy · Epistemology · Ideology · Multiculturalism · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Asian American and Pacific Histories · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Theater, Performance, and Music History · Theatre and Performance Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |