Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Der „naturalistische Fehlschluß“ als juristische Argumentationsfigur

Bibliographic Data

ID22286117
AuthorsSteffen Augsberg (wiss. Assistent, Universität zu Köln, Institut für Staatsrecht, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln)
Year2008
Volume94
Issue4
Pages461-476
Publication date2008-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0177-1108 • E-ISSN: 2363-5606
PublisherWissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.25162/arsp-2008-0035
OpenAlexW493363723
LanguageDE

The talk of a naturalistic fallacy has become rather common in recent bioethical debates, especially in the field of jurisprudence. The following article takes a closer look at the term, retracing it to its origin in the moral philosophy of G.E. Moore. The analysis shows that the concept of the naturalistic fallacy is not only philosophically highly controversial. It is also neither used correctly - in its original meaning - in the current debates nor is it very helpful to solve the specific juridical questions in bioethics

Bioethics · Epistemology · Fallacy · Jurisprudence · Naturalism · Political science · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Mathematics · Medical and Health Sciences Research · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae