Menschenwürde, Selbstbestimmung und Pluralismus
Zwischen sittlicher Vorgabe und deontologischer Konstruktion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22286526 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Gutmann (0000-0001-8215-0413, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Rechtsphilosophie und Medizinrecht, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Universitätsstraße 14–16, 48143 Münster), Michael Quante (0000-0001-6294-9826, Philosophisches Seminar, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Domplatz 6, 48143 Münster) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 103 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 322-336 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0177-1108 • E-ISSN: 2363-5606 |
| Publisher | Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.25162/arsp-2017-0239 |
| OpenAlex | W2765853447 |
| Language | DE |
The notion of human dignity fulfils different normative functions, making demands on heterogeneous resources for justification. After a short summary of Kant’s concept of dignity and its meta-ethica/ content which defines “Kantianism”, we will deal with three problematic aspects of the Kantian concept of dignity and provide a sketch of its (limited) reception in the German Constitution. Then we will present an ascriptivistic concept as an alternative to the Kantian one and discuss its limitations
Constitution · Dignity · Epistemology · German · Normative · Political science · Sketch · Sociology · Law · Law and Political Science · Mathematics · Medical and Health Sciences Research · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |