Assessing document and sentence readability in less resourced languages and across textual genres

Bibliographic Data

ID22299279
AuthorsFelice Dell’Orletta⋄ (0000-0003-3454-9387, Institute for Computational Linguistics “A. Zampolli”), Felice Dell’Orletta (Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale “Antonio Zampolli” (ILC-CNR), Pisa Italy), Simonetta Montemagni (0000-0002-2953-8619, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine), Giulia Venturi⋄ (0000-0001-5849-0979, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine), Giulia Venturi (0000-0002-1624-8946)
Year2014
Volume165
Issue2
Pages163-193
Publication date2014-12-31
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-0829 • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/itl.165.2.03del
OpenAlexW2031565004
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

In this paper, we tackle three underresearched issues of the automatic readability assessment literature, namely the evaluation of text readability in less resourced languages, with respect to sentences (as opposed to documents) as well as across textual genres. Different solutions to these issues have been tested by using and refining READ‐IT, the first advanced readability assessment tool for Italian, which combines traditional raw text features with lexical, morpho-syntactic and syntactic information. In READ‐IT readability assessment is carried out with respect to both documents and sentences, with the latter constituting an important novelty of the proposed approach: READ‐IT shows a high accuracy in the document classification task and promising results in the sentence classification scenario. By comparing the results of two versions of READ‐IT, adopting a classification‐ versus ranking-based approach, we also show that readability assessment is strongly influenced by textual genre; for this reason a genre-oriented notion of readability is needed. With classification-based approaches, reliable results can only be achieved with genre-specific models: Since this is far from being a workable solution, especially for less resourced languages, a new ranking method for readability assessment is proposed, based on the notion of distance

Information retrieval · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Novelty · Ranking (information retrieval) · Readability · Sentence · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub