Русская литература sub specie mortis
Набоковская интерпретация творчества Гоголя. Часть 2-я
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22301174 |
|---|---|
| Authors | György Zoltán Józsa (0000-0002-4803-6286, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 129-159 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3363 • E-ISSN: 1588-290X |
| Publisher | Akademiai Kiado Zrt. (PUBLISHER • HU) |
| DOI | 10.1556/sslav.59.2014.1.11 |
| OpenAlex | W2090339603 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
“Every Russian writer owes something to Gogol.” This Nabokovian statement questions beliefs traditionally formulated in respect to Gogol’s oeuvre. His book paradoxically introduced by the depiction of the writer’s death implies that the motif of death has a specific impact on the genesis of the artefact. The similar postmodernist theory by Terc echoes in part ideas found in the symbolist perception of Gogol (Annensky, Blok, Rozanov, Merezhkovsky, and Andrei Bely). Gogol’s poetics centred upon this principle, reminiscent of Dante’s Divine Comedy, can be traced throughout the works of Russian authors – a thesis to be scrutinised in a series of forthcoming articles. The irrational in Gogol’s views concerning true art thus shall discard the labels of critical realism and art envisaged as the device meant to perfect human society, consequently via the transmutation of the self shall true art fulfil its ultimate mission. Introducing the dichotomy of ‘poet’ – ‘non-poet’ indicates a precursor of the Solovyovian d
Aesthetics · Art · Comedy · Depiction · Irrational number · Literature · Motif (music) · Poetics · Poetry · Realism · Rigor mortis · Russian literature · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · History · Philosophy · Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|