Femicide as 'National Emergency
Risks and Rewards when Framing Violence against Women in Israel/Palestine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2230369 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tamar Ben David (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), T Zion-Waldoks (0000-0001-8538-563X, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 539-568 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/732867 |
| OpenAlex | W4407201530 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 33 |
For feminists, garnering the support of mainstream public opinion is a risky, if necessary, endeavor. In this article, we analyze contemporary feminist discourses regarding violence against women in Israel/Palestine, focusing on the latest, most extensive, and most successful attempt by feminists to transform Israeli public opinion on the subject. Our analysis exposes divergent feminist frames as they find purchase in mainstream discourses and enter the national agenda; we discuss their meanings and implications—both explicit and implicit, intentional and unintentional. Local feminist struggles evolved from efforts to define femicide as a social problem to framing it as a national emergency. We focus on three initiatives whose main goal has been to mobilize Israeli authorities and the public to combat femicide under the “national emergency” banner: the Women’s Protests, the Michal Sela Forum, and Gun-Free Kitchen Tables. Based on a discursive analysis of these case studies, we identify two contrasting feminist conceptualizations: the neoliberal securitist frame and the securitized care frame. We compare these opposing models, which coexisted at the mass protests of 2018–20, led by a broad and diverse coalition of Jews and Arabs campaigning for the worth of women’s lives and for the grievability of their deaths. Overall, we argue that feminists’ relative success in gaining mainstream endorsement may limit the path ahead and endanger the likelihood of contrasting frames and solidarities coexisting in the future. Specifically, we highlight the dangerous draw of innovatively framing femicide as a national emergency. It has huge potential for mobilization, but we warn that it risks neoliberal, militaristic, and nationalistic co-optation
Ancient history · Domestic violence · Femicide · Framing (construction) · Medical emergency · Palestine · Poison control · Political science · Suicide prevention · Engineering · Gender, Security, and Conflict · History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Medicine · Middle East Politics and Society
Artificial Unintelligence
Governance Feminism
The Oxford Handbook of International Security
News Coverage of Violence against Women
The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism
The Logic of Masculinist Protection
Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible
Radical-right cooptation of feminism in Israel
Can the subaltern securitize? Postcolonial perspectives on securitization theory and its critics
Speaking of Guns
Femonationalism and anti-gender backlash
Sexed Pistols. The Gendered Impacts of Small Arms and Light Weapons
The politics of honor
Homefront and Battlefront
Reframing the Narrative of the Battered Women’s Movement
She knew he would murder her’
Gender, context and constraint
Women's movement and the politics of framing
Feminist Mobilization and the Abortion Debate in Latin America
Starting a Conversation about Critical Frame Analysis
Security as care
Which Identity Frames Boost Support for and Mobilization in the #BlackLivesMatter Movement? An Experimental Test
Images of Criminals and Victims
Women's Movements and State Policy Reform Aimed at Domestic Violence Against Women
Theories of femicide and their significance for social research
Framing Processes and Social Movements
Anti-domestic Violence Coalition Practice
The Murders of Indigenous Women in Canada as Feminicides
Reexamining Femicide
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |