Metodfrågor och forskningsresultat inom biblisk arkeologi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22307405 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Magnus Ottosson (Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 2-13 |
| Publication date | 1977-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0348-1646 • E-ISSN: 2343-4929 |
| Publisher | Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.30752/nj.69348 |
| OpenAlex | W2473613024 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This article tries to outline the evolution of the archaeological methods used in Palestine from the days of Sir Flinders Petrie. A scientific method must be based on two fundamental principles, namely stratigraphy and typology of ceramics. Petrie’s main contribution was that he was the first archaeologist who used pottery, even shreds, for dating of structures on tell el-Hesy already in 1890. He arranged the pottery in typological series and made a system for sequence dating. After the Second World War, typology and stratigraphy were coordinated and all excavations could benefit from the results
Ancient history · Archaeology · Excavation · Palestine · Pottery · Typology · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · History · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts · Geology · Paleontology · Stratigraphy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |