Improving quality in pastoral care using the Pastoral Care Activity Tracker (PCAT)
A feasibility study of a digital tool within an Australian healthcare organization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22310808 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Calder (HammondCare, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia), Matthew Andreotta (0000-0002-2996-6031, The Dementia Centre, HammondCare, Osborne Park, WA, Australia), Thomas Morris (0000-0003-3627-6095, The Dementia Centre, HammondCare, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia), Mustafa Atee (0000-0002-0837-3245, The Dementia Centre, HammondCare, Osborne Park, WA, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 353-367 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-4726 • E-ISSN: 1528-6916 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08854726.2022.2091837 |
| PMID | 35820050 |
| OpenAlex | W4285088980 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
Background Activity reporting of Pastoral Care Coordinators (PCCs) is often inadequate within care settings because of suboptimal analog data collection methods. This study aims to render pastoral care activity reporting more efficient through digitizing data collection in pastoral care settings.Methods A one-year feasibility (pilot) study of a digital tool, the “Pastoral Care Activity Tracker” (PCAT) was conducted between June 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 at HammondCare, an Australian nonprofit healthcare organization. Feasibility was measured using electronic activity logs collected by the tool and user feedback surveys by PCCs.Results Of the 43 PCCs working in the organization, 42 (97.7%) used the PCAT tool to complete the logging of 66,298 pastoral care activities (M [SD] = 1,578.5 [827.8] activities per PCC). Most activities were logged successfully (98.3%) and took less than one minute (89.5%). Survey responses (n = 20, 46.6%) indicated many PCCs found the PCAT more convenient (n = 15, 75.0%) and easier to use (n = 10, 50.0%) than paper-based method.Conclusions PCCs found the PCAT to be feasible, favorable, and easier to use for report generation compared to paper-based methods. The feasibility of the PCAT improved pastoral care activity data capture, as perceived by PCCs
Data collection · Geography · Health care · Logging · Pastoral care · Political science · Sociology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
SQUIRE 2.0 ( Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
What do I do? Developing a taxonomy of chaplaincy activities and interventions for spiritual care in intensive care unit palliative care
Improving the Quality of Spiritual Care as a Dimension of Palliative Care
Improving the Spiritual Dimension of Whole Person Care
Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable
Documenting chaplain involvement
What Do Chaplains Really Do? II. Interventions in the New York Chaplaincy Study
Practical Matters and Ultimate Concerns, 'Doing,' and 'Being
| Highly cited | No |
|---|