Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Abuse of Rights

A Comparative Study between Mālikī Jurisprudence & Positive Law

Bibliographic Data

ID22317784
AuthorsChami Yassine (0000-0003-0065-3936), Yassine Chami (0009-0008-7734-4094), Dina Imad (0000-0002-3674-9481), Maya Khater (0000-0002-5892-9176), Mohamed El Arbi Aoka
Year2025
Volume25
Issue2
Pages415-428
Publication date2025-12-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1412-4734 • E-ISSN: 2407-8646
PublisherLP2M Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15408/ajis.v25i2.44606
OpenAlexW7117243678
LanguageEN
Citations received2

This paper offers a comparative analytical evaluation of the theory of abuse of rights as articulated within Mālikī jurisprudence and in positive law. It highlights the doctrinal foundations of this theory within the Mālikī school, characterized by the extensive application of this concept to encompass all types of harm, supported by evidence from the Holy Quran and Sunnah. The research also employs a qualitative method based on a comparative analysis of classic jurisprudential texts, such as al-Muwāfaqāt, al-Furūq, and al-Mudawwanah, while specifically focusing on contemporary positive law, such as the civil codes of Egypt and Algeria. The study demonstrates that there is a high degree of overlap between the core criteria laid down by Mālikī jurisprudence related to the abuse of rights and the related criteria adopted in contemporary positive law, especially concerning three basic criteria: the illegitimacy of the interest; the intent to harm others; and the inconsistency between the interest sought and the harm caused. The study also demonstrates that Mālikī jurisprudence was at the forefront of developing an integrated theory of abuse of rights that carefully balances private interests with broader public-interest principles. Abstrak Paper ini menyajikan evaluasi analitis komparatif terhadap teori penyalahgunaan hak sebagaimana dirumuskan dalam fikih Mālikī dan dalam hukum positif. Kajian ini menyoroti landasan doktrinal teori tersebut dalam mazhab Mālikī, yang dikenal penerapannya yang luas sehingga mencakup semua bentuk kemudaratan, didukung oleh dalil-dalil dari Al-Qur’an dan Sunnah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan komparatif terhadap teks-teks fikih klasik, seperti al-Muwāfaqāt, al-Furūq, dan al-Mudawwanah, serta membandingkannya dengan hukum positif kontemporer, khususnya dalam kodifikasi perdata Mesir dan Aljazair. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya tingkat keselarasan yang signifikan antara prinsip dasar dalam fikih Mālikī terkait penyalahgunaan hak dan prinsip yang diadopsi dalam hukum positif modern, terutama terkait tiga prinsip utama: ketidakabsahan kepentingan yang diperjuangkan; adanya niat untuk merugikan pihak lain; dan ketidakseimbangan antara tujuan yang ingin dicapai dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Studi ini juga menegaskan bahwa fikih Mālikī berada di garda terdepan dalam merumuskan teori penyalahgunaan hak yang komprehensif, yang mampu menyeimbangkan kepentingan individu dengan prinsip kemaslahatan umum

Fiqh · Harm · Harm principle · Jurisprudence · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies · Medical Research and Islamic Perspectives

  • Governing Legal Chatbots

    Open Access•Enas Qutieshat, Majed Ahmed Saleh Al Adwan et al.•Research Journal in Advanced…•2026

  • Civil litigation management between Algerian and Emirati legislation

    Open Access•Chami Yassine, Enas Qutieshat•Cogent Social Sciences•2026

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae