Reforming the Rules on the Division of Joint Property
A Progressive Legal Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22317992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Khairina Khairina, Khairani Khairani (0009-0008-1593-3715, Andalas University), Roni Efendi, Kasmuri Kasmuri (Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau), Okky Afrianto (King Saud University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 193 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1412-6109 • E-ISSN: 2580-2763 |
| Publisher | Iain Batusangkar (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31958/juris.v23i1.11565 |
| OpenAlex | W4400220027 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 9 |
According to Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991 concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Articles 96 and 97 on the division of joint property, each person in a marriage that dissolves due to divorce or death is entitled to half of the property that is joint property. However, the legal circumstances presented in Payakumbuh Religious Court's Decision No. 657/Pdt.G/2022/PA Pyk did not follow the KHI and gave the plaintiff (the husband) a portion of 1⁄4 and the defendant (the wife) a share of 3⁄4 of the joint property. Therefore, the goal of the analysis presented in this article is to respond to the judge's ratio decidendi when it comes to joint property that are unrelated to the KHI. Then, a more thorough explanation of progressive law as a method of legal change in the realm of community property is provided. The research approach employed in this paper is the normative legal method. The investigation's findings demonstrate that the judge's reasoning is predicated on the idea that the wife's inherited assets, rather than the husband's income from their marriage, constitute the joint property at issue in the proceedings. In terms of income, living expenses, or child-education expenses, the plaintiff was unable to demonstrate how much he contributed to the defendant's household during their time together. The plaintiff could not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim that he could afford to buy the property, house, and four-wheeled vehicle that are at issue. According to the judge's ruling, progressive law satisfies societal legal requirements. The judge's ruling about the contribution of joint assets served as a legal justification for not dividing joint assets in half, based on the facts of the case
Community property · Law and economics · Normative · Plaintiff · Political science · Realm · Sociology · Wife · Engineering · Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies · Law · Legal Studies and Policies · Marriage and Family Dynamics
Mempertegas Ide Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Sistem Kewarisan Bilateral
Progresivitas Hakim Pengadilan Agama
Hak Cerai Perempuan Dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Maroko
Kajian Kritis Teori Hukum Progresif terhadap Status Anak di Luar Nikah dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010
Keadilan Distributif atas Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan bagi Keluarga Muslim di Indonesia
Implementasi Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Pada Pengadilan Agama Sawahlunto
Konsep Pembagian Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Kontribusi Dalam Perkawinan
Sirri Marriage Celebration and Its Impact on Social Change in Banjarese Community, South Kalimantan
Marital Beslag Outside Divorce Lawsuit in the Maqashid Syari’ah Perspective
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |