A Zaydī Qur’an Commentary from Yemen
An Introduction to Tajrīd al-Kashshāf maʿa ziyādat nukat liṭāf
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22318487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott Luca (0000-0003-2587-8461, University of Arizona, corresponding author), Scott C Lucas (University of Arizona) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 36-69 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Qur'anic Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1465-3591 • E-ISSN: 1755-1730 |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3366/jqs.2021.0478 |
| OpenAlex | W4200149679 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
This article provides an introduction to Tajrīd al-Kashshāf, a Qur’an commentary written by the Yemeni Zaydī scholar Ibn Abī’l-Qāsim (d. 837/1433–1434) that remains unpublished. Despite his reputation as a partisan Zaydī, Ibn Abī’l-Qāsim’s Qur’an commentary draws exclusively upon Sunni tafsīr works, especially al-Zamakhsharī’s al-Kashshāf, al-Wāḥidī’s al-Wasīṭ, and Ibn al-Jawzī’s Zād al-masīr. Through a careful analysis of his commentary on the Sūrat al-Najm (Q. 53) and Q. 5:55, this article illuminates Ibn Abī’l-Qāsim’s sources and exegetical techniques. It contains a critical edition of Ibn Abī’l-Qāsim’s commentary on Sūrat al-Najm and highlights the intimate relationship between Zaydī and Sunni Qur’anic exegesis
Art · Exegesis · Fiqh · Islam · Literature · Sharia · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Families in Therapy and Culture · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy
Studies in Medieval Islamic Intellectual Traditions
Handlist of Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the University of Leiden and Other Collections in the Netherlands
History of the Arabic Written Tradition Volume 1
A Traditional Mu'tazilite Qur'ān Commentary
Propagating Mu'tazilism in the VIth/XIIth Century Zaydiyya
Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |