Appropriate Versus Inappropriate Antibiotic Administration, Prior To Versus After the Diagnosis of Septic Shock. Impact on Patients with Sepsis Admitted to a Saudi Intensive Care Unit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22320090 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Haifa Algethamy (0000-0003-1381-521X, King Abdulaziz University), Ayman Morish (King Abdulaziz University), Mohammad Numan (King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital), Abdullah Alotaibi (0000-0001-7780-8137, King Abdulaziz University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 20 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Materia Socio Medica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1512-7680 • E-ISSN: 1986-597X |
| Publisher | ScopeMed (PUBLISHER • TR) |
| DOI | 10.5455/msm.2020.32.20-28 |
| PMID | 32410887 |
| OpenAlex | W3013206026 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
INTRODUCTION: Delaying broad-spectrum antibiotics beyond 1-2 hours once the septic shock is diagnosed increases patients' risk of death. However, what is the impact of already being on antibiotics when a septic shock is diagnosed? AIM: We compared demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes in septic shock patients on antibiotics initiated prior to versus after septic shock was diagnosed; whose initial antibiotics were considered appropriate for the offending organism(s); and who died in versus were discharged from the ICU. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 161 patients ≥ 14-years-old (female: male=1:1; mean age 61.1yrs) admitted to the ICU for septic shock, and followed for ≥30 days, or until hospital discharge or death. RESULTS: Few inter-group differences were identified. Those treated early were more likely to have a nosocomial infection (p=0.03), skin or soft tissue source of their infection (p=0.01), or a diabetes-related limb amputation (p=0.02); but received fewer antibiotics (p=0.01). Those on appropriate antibiotics were more likely to be female (p=0.048), but less likely to have a skin or soft tissue source of infection (p=0.03). Neither starting antibiotics early, nor being on appropriate antibiotics impacted any outcome measure, including survival. Predictors of mortality were ≥1 co-morbid condition (p=0.03), more versus fewer co-morbid conditions (p=0.009), cardiovascular disease at baseline (p=03), requiring dialysis at baseline (p=0.008), and a higher day#1 SOFA score (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data fail to demonstrate any benefit to being on antibiotics prior to the diagnosis, irrespective of whether the ultimately-identified offending organism is sensitive or resistant
Amputation · Antibiotics · Demographics · Dialysis · Intensive care medicine · Intensive care unit · Sepsis · Septic shock · SOFA score · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Internal Medicine · Surgery
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |