Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Appropriate Versus Inappropriate Antibiotic Administration, Prior To Versus After the Diagnosis of Septic Shock. Impact on Patients with Sepsis Admitted to a Saudi Intensive Care Unit

Bibliographic Data

ID22320090
AuthorsHaifa Algethamy (0000-0003-1381-521X, King Abdulaziz University), Ayman Morish (King Abdulaziz University), Mohammad Numan (King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital), Abdullah Alotaibi (0000-0001-7780-8137, King Abdulaziz University)
Year2020
Volume32
Issue1
Pages20
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMateria Socio Medica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1512-7680 • E-ISSN: 1986-597X
PublisherScopeMed (PUBLISHER • TR)
DOI10.5455/msm.2020.32.20-28
PMID32410887
OpenAlexW3013206026
LanguageEN
References cited1

INTRODUCTION: Delaying broad-spectrum antibiotics beyond 1-2 hours once the septic shock is diagnosed increases patients' risk of death. However, what is the impact of already being on antibiotics when a septic shock is diagnosed? AIM: We compared demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes in septic shock patients on antibiotics initiated prior to versus after septic shock was diagnosed; whose initial antibiotics were considered appropriate for the offending organism(s); and who died in versus were discharged from the ICU. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 161 patients ≥ 14-years-old (female: male=1:1; mean age 61.1yrs) admitted to the ICU for septic shock, and followed for ≥30 days, or until hospital discharge or death. RESULTS: Few inter-group differences were identified. Those treated early were more likely to have a nosocomial infection (p=0.03), skin or soft tissue source of their infection (p=0.01), or a diabetes-related limb amputation (p=0.02); but received fewer antibiotics (p=0.01). Those on appropriate antibiotics were more likely to be female (p=0.048), but less likely to have a skin or soft tissue source of infection (p=0.03). Neither starting antibiotics early, nor being on appropriate antibiotics impacted any outcome measure, including survival. Predictors of mortality were ≥1 co-morbid condition (p=0.03), more versus fewer co-morbid conditions (p=0.009), cardiovascular disease at baseline (p=03), requiring dialysis at baseline (p=0.008), and a higher day#1 SOFA score (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data fail to demonstrate any benefit to being on antibiotics prior to the diagnosis, irrespective of whether the ultimately-identified offending organism is sensitive or resistant

Amputation · Antibiotics · Demographics · Dialysis · Intensive care medicine · Intensive care unit · Sepsis · Septic shock · SOFA score · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Internal Medicine · Surgery

  • The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

    Mervyn Singer, Clifford S Deutschman et al.•JAMA•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae