The Development and Initial Validation of the Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Survey for Elementary School Students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22327410 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diana Akhmedjanova (0000-0002-9643-5660, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Evgenia Lizunova (0009-0004-1694-9875, National Research University Higher School of Economics) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 387-407 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1813-8918 • E-ISSN: 2541-9226 |
| Publisher | National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.17323/1813-8918-2024-2-387-407 |
| OpenAlex | W4399993870 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
Self-regulated learning (SRL) refers to the processes of setting goals, monitoring progress, selecting learning strategies, and revising learning goals. Research evidence shows positive associations between SRL and academic achievement, motivation, well-being, and other constructs. The purpose of this paper is to establish the initial evidence of the construct validity of the SRL Strategies survey for elementary school students. The SRL Strategies survey includes 12 items, focusing on the strategies of environment, time, and learning management ranging from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always) on a Likert-type scale. The unified validity framework (Messick, 1995) was used to conduct the validation study by collecting content, internal structure, convergent, discriminant, and response processes evidence. The application of classical test theory (CTT) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, reliability estimates, and Pearson’s correlations on a sample of 1,877 fourth graders provided initial evidence of construct validity by suggesting a one-factor model, which was confirmed on another sample of elementary school students (n = 317). The additional item response theory (IRT) analyses provided evidence of differential item functioning for Items 2, 5, and 6 based on student gender, but not on location. Combined evidence from CTT and IRT analyses resulted in acceptable properties of the combined one-factor SRL Strategies survey (α = 0.83; ωh = 0.71, ωt = 0.85). As a result, the SRL Strategies survey can be recommended for the use by researchers and practitioners
Mathematics education · Education and Learning Interventions · Education, Safety, and Science Studies · Psychology · Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
A Review of Self-regulated Learning
The longitudinal effect of children’s self-regulated learning on reading habits and well-being
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of self-regulated learning interventions on academic achievement in online and blended environments in K-12 and higher education
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega
Validity of psychological assessment
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research
When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules
| Highly cited | No |
|---|