Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do Effect Sizes in Psychology Laboratory Experiments Mean Anything in Reality

Bibliographic Data

ID22327459
AuthorsRoy F Baumeister (0000-0003-1413-3296, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Roy Baumeister
Year2020
Volume17
Issue4
Pages803-811
Publication date2020-12-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueПсихология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1813-8918 • E-ISSN: 2541-9226
PublisherNational Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-803-811
OpenAlexW3133184452
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited4

The artificial environment of a psychological laboratory experiment offers an excellent method for testing whether a causal relationship exists, — but it is mostly useless for predicting the size and power of such effects in normal life. In comparison with effects out in the world, laboratory effects are often artificially large, because the laboratory situation is set up precisely to capture this effect, with extraneous factors screened out. Equally problematic, laboratory effects are often artificially small, given practical and ethical constraints that make laboratory situations watered-down echoes of what happens in life. Furthermore, in many cases the very notion of a true effect size (as if it were constant across different manipulations and dependent variables) is absurd. These problems are illustrated with examples from the author’s own research programs. It is also revealing that experimental effect sizes, though often quite precisely calculated and proudly integrated into meta-analyses, have attracted almost zero attention in terms of substantive theory about human mental processes and behavior. At best, effect sizes from laboratory experiments provide information that could help other researchers to design their experiments, — but that means effect sizes are shop talk, not information about reality. It is recommended that researchers shift toward a more realistic appreciation of how little can be learned about human mind and behavior from effect sizes in laboratory studies

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Confirmation bias · Experimental psychology · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Defending one's worldview under mortality salience

    Open Access•Simon Schindler, Nina Reinhardt et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2020

  • Effects of mental fatigue on Olympic ball sports performance

    Open Access•Xiaoyang Pan, Kim Geok Soh et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem

    Open Access•Ginette C Blackhart, Brian C Nelson et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2009

  • The Future and the Will

    Open Access•Hallgeir Sjåstad, Roy F Baumeister•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • Choking under pressure

    Roy F Baumeister•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  • If you can't join them, beat them

    J M Twenge, Roy F Baumeister et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae