Sub-Sentential Logical Form. On Robert J. Stainton’s Words and Thoughts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22329613 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia (0000-0002-0693-5910, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 129 |
| Pages | 53-63 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-1503 • E-ISSN: 1870-4905 |
| Publisher | Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (PUBLISHER • MX) |
| DOI | 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2011.788 |
| OpenAlex | W38126167 |
| Language | EN |
Stainton argues (2006, 2001) that since sub-sentential speech acts lack the proper syntactic structure to have logical form, it is not from them that subsententially propositions conveyed derive their logical form. In this brief comment, I develop an argument for the claim that sub-sentential speech acts not only do have the proper syntactic structure, but that according to Stainton’s own general pragmatic account of sub-sentential speech, they also satisfy all the criteria put forward by him to be the primary bearers of logical form
Linguistics · Logical conjunction · Logical consequence · Logical form · Computer Science · Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|