Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Émile Mersch and theology of the russian diaspora

Bibliographic Data

ID22333704
AuthorsPavel Khondzinskii (0000-0001-9805-045X, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume102
Pages29-49
Publication date2022-08-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSt. Tikhons' University Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1991-640X • E-ISSN: 1991-640X
PublisherSt. Tikhon's Orthodox University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.15382/sturi2022102.29-49
OpenAlexW4295279313
LanguageEN
Citations received1

In 1933 the Catholic scholar Emile Mersch published his work “The Mystical Body of Christ” (Le Corps mystique du Christ), in which the concept of the “mystical body” was traced from early Christian times to the beginning of the 20th century. Having paid tribute to Eastern fathers, Mersch believed that this concept reaches its final synthesis in the works of the “French school” authors in the 17th century, where the concept of personal mystical unity with Christ, dating back to the Rhine mystics, is combined with the idea of St. Cyril of Alexandria and St. Hilary of Pictavia of the “natural” unity of the Church in the Eucharist. Mersch considered this synthesis to be a complete expression of St. Augustine’s teachings of the Church as the “total Christ” (the whole Christ) - totus Christus. Some authors of the diaspora paid their attention to the Mersch’s monography. M. Lot-Borodina wrote a review to this work. Fr. Sergey Bulgakov used this work as a source of the references to blessed Augustine. But it was Fr. Georges Florovsky who treated this work most thoughtfully. In the description of his response to the Mersch’s work, we need to remember that initially Fr. Georges based on the position, which was formed in Russian theology by representatives of “new theology” at the beginning of the 20th century, first of all – the position of metropolitan Antony (Khrapovitsky). This position was characterized by the constitution of the unity of the Church on the moral rather than Eucharistic level. The moral level was regarded, because of the personalistic concept of the mutual transparency of persons, as a natural unity. The article traces the gradual evolution of Fr. Georges’s views from the above concept, through an attempt to combine the teaching of totus Christus with the teaching of metropolitan Anthony, to the unambiguously expressed Christological emphasis in ecclesiology. As a result, Florovsky's late ecclesiology reveals a certain closeness to the ecclesiology of the French school, and hence to Mersch’s general conceptual conclusions

Art · Body of Christ · Church Fathers · Eucharist · Mysticism · Theology · Philosophy · Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends

  • Митрополит Антоний (Храповицкий) — выдающийся русский иерарх, мыслитель, богослов XX в. К 160-летию со дня рождения (1863–1936). Материалы круглого стола научного проекта СПбДА «Византийский кабинет»

    Pavel Khondzinskii, Н Н Павлюченков et al.•Русско-Византийский вестник•2024

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae