Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Acquisition of Adjective Gradation in Lithuanian Children with Developmental Language Disorder at Preschool and Pre-primary School Age

Bibliographic Data

ID22333901
AuthorsLaura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė (0000-0001-6020-4556, Vytautas Magnus University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume16
Pages76-85
Publication date2021-12-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTaikomoji kalbotyra (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2029-8935 • E-ISSN: 2029-8935
PublisherVilnius University Press (PUBLISHER • LT)
DOI10.15388/taikalbot.2021.16.5
OpenAlexW4210636826
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

The aim of the study is to examine Lithuanian children’s with developmental language disorder abilities in forming comparative and superlative degrees of adjectives. We report the data from a Sentence Completion Study with 80 Lithuanian children with developmental language disorder (age range 4;6-6;5) and 80 typically developing Lithuanian children (age range 4;6-6;5). For the picture-based comparative and superlative formation task, 30 adjectives were selected to control for the following variables in Lithuanian: obligatory morphonological palatalisation of root-final dentals, the variables syllabic length (bisyllables vs. trisyllables) and underived vs. derived adjectives.The results confirmed our first hypothesis that correct production of both comparatives and superlatives is influenced by several factors: the general length effect, morphological complexity of the adjective (whether derived or not), morphotactic transparency/opacity (opacifying morphonological palatalization). The results confirmed our second hypothesis that Lithuanian children with developmental language disorder faced more difficulties in performing the adjective gradation task than typically developing children. In addition, the results have shown that children’s performance on comparatives was better than on superlatives. The better performance of comparatives could be explained by the fact that the superlative is morphosemantically and morphotactically more marked than the comparative. On the other hand, it could be, according to Layton and Stick’s hypothesis (1979), that the later acquisition of the superlative suffix is due to limitations in cognitive and perceptual abilities, which may be seen as one cause of morphosemantic markedness

Adjective · Bulgarian · Developmental psychology · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Lithuanian · Mathematics education · Noun · Superlative · Syllabic verse · Language Development and Disorders · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • Žurnalo „Taikomoji kalbotyra“ dešimtmetis. Publikacijų apžvalga

    Open Access•Meilutė Ramonienė, Kinga Geben•Taikomoji kalbotyra•2022

  • Pronunciation simplification strategies in child language. Experimental study

    Open Access•Eglė Krivickaitė•Taikomoji kalbotyra•2017

  • Comprehension and production of comparatives and superlatives

    Open Access•Thomas L Layton, Sheldon L Stick•Journal of Child Language•1979

  • Delayed language development

    Open Access•Ingrida Balčiunienė, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė•Baltistica•2018

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae