Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Piety, Authority and “Popular Ijtihad” in the Online Space of Russian Muslims during the Pandemic

Bibliographic Data

ID22336864
AuthorsSofya Ragozina (0000-0003-2732-0226, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume39
Issue1
Pages76-100
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueState Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2073-7203 • E-ISSN: 2073-7211
PublisherThe Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-1-76-100
OpenAlexW3157736848
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited3

This article examines the first reactions of the Russian Muslim com‐ munity in the social networks to the spread of the coronavirus (mostly February‐May 2020). We turn to the concepts of authority and legitimacy; the ideas of Brian Turner on the performative role of in‐ formation technology for the institution of religious authority; Gary Bunt’s discussion of the democratization of Islamic knowledge in the online environment; Olivier Roy’s concept of individualization of Islam; and Peter Mandaville’s idea of decentralization of power in the Islamic tradition. This study seeks to answer two interrelated questions: who and how reinterprets the category of Islamic piety in the context of the pandemic and to what extent the online environment transforms the Islamic tradition as a whole. Based on textual analysis of individual publications on social networks and interviews with editors of public websites, the common narratives of Russian Muslim discourse on the pandemic were identified as follows: a retaliation against China for the oppression of Muslim Uighurs; the search for the signs of the coming doomsday; various approaches to the reinterpretation of religious piety. We suggest the term “popular” or “spontaneous” ijtihad to describe the variety of individualized strategies stimulated by the crisis. The construction of these strategies would not have been possible without the virtual environment, characterized by the polyarchic community of “online ulema” and the digitalization of religious practices

Democratization · Islam · Legitimacy · Piety · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender Studies · History · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

  • Crimean Tatars in the Digital Age

    Elmira Muratova•Journal of Religion in Europe•2024

  • Representation of Religious Consciousness in Digital Media Discourse

    Open Access•Arsenii Anatol'evich Belomytsev•Культура и искусство•2026

  • What Does the Mufti Say? Internal and Public Debates about Islam in Russia

    J Schmoller, Marlène Laruelle•Problems of Post-Communism•2025

  • Cyber-Islamic Environment in the Religious Field of Kazakhstan

    Open Access•Kupeshov Kanat, Satershinov Bakhitzhan et al.•Journal of Islamic Thought and…•2025

  • Three Forms of Mediatized Religion

    Open Access•Hjarvard, Stig Hjarvard•State Religion and Church in…•2020

  • Secular Translations

    Talal Asad•Secular Translations•2018

  • Individualization and religious authority in Western European Islam

    Frank Peters, Frank Peter•Islam and Christian–Muslim…•2005

Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae