Conceptions of Church Slavonic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22344466 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helmut Keipert (University of Bonn, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 8-75 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slovene (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2304-0785 • E-ISSN: 2305-6754 |
| Publisher | Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.31168/2305-6754.2017.6.1.1 |
| OpenAlex | W2767670951 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 25 |
In our time Church Slavonic is a “language without native speakers,” but it is not in all respects a “dead” one. It is for this reason that the Slavs have given it a great variety of names, the different use of which in philological publications heavily depends on the respective linguists’ connotative purposes (e.g., national and ideological interests and so forth). As a rule, the description of the language is based on the analysis of written or printed texts. Only recently have a few additional corpora been introduced in addition to the well-known group of “classical” Old Church Slavonic manuscripts, which, for all their merits in the history of Slavistics, can give only a vague idea of the rich language tradition of Church Slavonic as a whole, since, as a means of actual (oral) communication, it can nowadays be observed only in the liturgy. The article discusses the main linguistic conceptions applied to Church Slavonic in the past and present (root language, i.e., proto-language, common language, literary language [Schriftsprache], Ausbau language, etc.); singles out binaristic approaches in opposition to vernaculars; gives an overview of the numerous varieties to be differentiated within the language (connected to regions, chronology, functions, individuals, and groups); recalls the role of reconstruction in modern textbooks and the widely neglected construction devices used in early grammars and dictionaries; and, at the end, refers to the possibility of including Church Slavonic as a model for comparative judgments on degrees of diversity in the structural development of Slavonic languages
Etymology · Ideology · Linguistics · Philology · Political science · Politics · Slavic languages · Sociology · Standard language · Classics · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · History · Law · Linguistics and language evolution · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
Predictors of correct interpretation of English and Bulgarian idioms by Russian speakers
Standardization in Balkan Slavic Diachronic Research
Historicodogmatic Treatise by Elias Meniates and its 18th-century Serbian Translators from Greek
Church Slavonic Version of Caesar Baronius Annales Ecclesiastici and Chudov Translations from the 17 th Century
Das altkirchenslavische Wort. Bildung, Bedeutung, Herleitung
Die slavischen Sprachen / The Slavic Languages
Istorija russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (XI-XVII vv.)
The Primary Slavic Complex of Liturgical Books of the Byzantine Rite (“Clement’s corpus”) and the Formation of the Macedonian Redaction of Church Slavonic
The Serbian Redaction of the Church Slavonic Language
Linguistic Features of the Earliest Copy of the Didactic Gospel by Constantine the Presbyteros
Some problems of the second South Slavic influence in Russia
Some Problems of the Second South Slavic Influence in Russia
Československý typ cirkevnej slovančiny
Altslawische Grammatik
Beiträge zur Geschichte der Nominalkomposita im Serbokroatischen
Slavia Orthodoxa
Die Adjektiva auf -telbnb. Studien zu einem kirchenslavischen Wortbildungstyp
Die kirchenslavischen Elemente in der modernen russischen Literatursprache
Imennoe sklonenie v slavianskikh iazykakh XI-XIV vv. Lingvostatisticheskii analiz po materialam pamiatnikov drevneslavianskoi pis'mennosti
Das morphologische System des altkirchenslavischen Verbums
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |