Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Non, Linguistic Criteria of Peoples’ Classification in the “Military Encyclopedic Lexicon”

Bibliographic Data

ID22348523
AuthorsArtyom Y Peretyatko (0000-0003-2779-2223, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume20
Issue1-2
Pages27-52
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSlavic World in the Third Millennium (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2412-6446 • E-ISSN: 2782-442X
PublisherInstitute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.31168/2412-6446.2025.20.1-2.02
OpenAlexW7102815911
LanguageEN

In scientific ethnography of the 19th century the idea about the importance of linguistic factor in peoples’ classifi cation was prevalent (the failed Second general census of the population of the Russian Empire considered respondent’s native language to “deter- mine his nationality”; language criterion of peoples’ classification was deemed deter- minant in the “Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary”). The article shows that notions about language being an indispensable attribute of a separate people had some- what spread beyond the scientific discourse too (for example, the classic of Russian literature M. Ye. Saltykov-Shchedrin and the Don poet A. A. Leonov refused to consid- er the Don Cossacks a people, pointing out their lack of unique language). However, such notions cannot be considered universally accepted. In particular, the “Military Encyclopedic Lexicon”, which was published by the military, has a number of articles where peoples are not classified by linguistic factor. D. A. Milyutin used classification by physical appearances and features for the peoples of Africa, N. V. Savelyev-Rosti- slavich ― classification by “places of habitation” for the Slavs, and the editor of this encyclopedia, L. I. Seddeler, just unsystematically listed the peoples in his articles on regional geography. Moreover, of these three authors only D. A. Milyutin used a rela- tively consistent terminology, and only he mentioned at all the contemporary languages of the peoples he was describing. The “Encyclopedia of Military and Naval Sciences”, a later military dictionary of the 19th century, also has articles in which peoples are classified by criteria not wholly understandable and, probably, non-linguistic. Thus, not only a clear understanding that every people must have their own language was absent among the military of the 19th century Russian Empire ― it was acceptable to completely ignore linguistic issues in the texts on regional geography and ethnography

Census · Empire · Ethnography · Population · Russian language · Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies · Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies · Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae