Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perception of Generation Z, Y, X, and Baby Boomers on Expansion of Lawn Uses in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID22350650
AuthorsEun-Ji Bae (0000-0003-4597-8873, Institute of Forest Science), Keun Huh (0000-0002-5162-4257, Gyeongsang National University), Yun Eui Choi (0000-0002-9114-6309)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue1
Pages97-106
Publication date2025-02-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of People, Plants, and Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2508-7673 • E-ISSN: 2508-7681
PublisherKorean Society for People, Plants, and Environment (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.11628/ksppe.2025.28.1.97
OpenAlexW4408421043
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited18

Background and objective: Expanding the use of lawns is necessary for environmental improvement and climate change mitigation. This study analyzed public perceptions of expanding lawn uses with different generations.Methods: We divided the respondents into Generation Z, Generation Y (Millennials), Generation X (Xers), and Baby Boomers, and analyzed the experiences and preferences of lawn uses, and the perception of the need for lawn planting or installation (hereinafter referred to as "lawn P/I") in major locations and expanding lawn uses. A survey was conducted online from May to June 2024 nationwide. The survey had a total of 1,012 respondents, including 189 from Generation Z, 288 from Generation Y, 309 from Generation X, and 226 from the Baby Boomers. The collected data were statistically analyzed using chi-square test, multiple regression analysis, etc.Results: For the frequency of places where lawns were experienced and the amount of time spent on lawns, statistically significant differences were found among generations. Preferred activities on lawns did not differ. There was no difference between generations in the perception of the need for lawn P/I in places such as parks, idle land, and reserved land, but there was a difference between generations in places such as school playgrounds, artificial grounds, and pet parks. Generation Z had a statistically significantly lower perception of the need to expand the use of lawns for eco-friendly living environment management. Compared to Baby Boomers, Generation Z also had a statistically significantly lower perception of the need for policies to expand green spaces with lawns, and the need for national institute-led research. There was no statistically significant difference between generations in the perception of the need for policies to revitalize the lawn industry, but Generation Z's interest in or expectations for jobs related to the lawn industry seemed to be low.Conclusion: Lawn use experiences and preferences, as well as perceptions of the need for lawns, need to be considered by generations. Generations Z and Y have limited experience with lawns and perceive the need for lawn P/I as low, with Generation Z showing a significant difference in particular. Baby Boomers have a positive attitude toward lawns as a part of nature. Generation X and Baby Boomers have a high level of perception of the need for policies and research to expand lawn use, and showed a positive attitude toward lawn industrialization and job creation. The public relations of policies and research to expand lawn use toward Generations Z and Y will be necessary

Advertising · Baby boomers · Biology · Business · Demographic economics · Economics · Generation x · Geography · Lawn · Perception · Sociology · Demography · Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies · Psychology · Turfgrass Adaptation and Management

  • What would a park afford our youth? Perceived affordance values of urban parks from the perspective of Generation Z

    Open Access•Shixian Luo, Kexin Li et al.•Trees Forests and People•2026

  • Perception and Intent to Participate of Indigenous Residents on Rural Tourism and Urban-Rural Exchange in Namhae County, South Korea

    Open Access•Myeong Sik Park, Inhea Kim•Journal of People, Plants, and…•2022

  • Factors Predicting Rural Residents’ Support of Tourism

    Open Access•Nancy Gard Mcgehee, Kathleen L Andereck•Travel Research Bulletin•2004

  • Resident attitudes

    Open Access•Dogan Gursoy, Claudia Jurowski et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2002

  • Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts

    Open Access•Kathleen L Andereck, Karin M Valentine et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae