Preference Analysis for Flower Jewelry Using Conjoint Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22350933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yeon Hee Kim (0000-0002-9409-7354, Daegu Catholic University), Mi Jin Kim (0000-0003-2096-1485, Daegu Catholic University), Suk Young Yun (0000-0002-5862-0021, Daegu Catholic University), Taeg Won Chang (Daegu Catholic University), Byung Jin Choi (0000-0001-8983-544X, Daegu Catholic University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 253-262 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of People, Plants, and Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2508-7673 • E-ISSN: 2508-7681 |
| Publisher | Korean Society for People, Plants, and Environment (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.3.253 |
| OpenAlex | W4285046470 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Background and objective This study was conducted to determine the preferences in flower jewelry by conducting a survey using conjoint analysis on the perception of flower jewelry and provide basic data for development of flower jewelry products. Methods For the conjoint analysis, four attributes of flower jewelry were selected. Attribute 1 was related to the main material of flower jewelry, presented in three levels: cut flowers, potted flowers, and processed flowers. Attribute 2 was related to wearing area presented in five levels of wearing area: hair, neck, ear, arm (wrist) and chest (shoulder). Attribute 3 was related to price provided for selling products in flower shops, presented in three levels: less than 30,000 won, 50,000–70,000 won, and more than 100,000 won. Attribute 4 was related to flower jewelry wearing time, presented in three levels: less than 6 hours, 12–24 hours, and more than 24 hours. After extracting 25 profiles through orthogonal design, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 402 general participants, from which the responses of 343 participants were analyzed. Results By attribute of flower jewelry, the respondents attached most importance to price (34.14%), followed by wearing area (29.18%), wearing time (18.51%), and material (18.17%), proving that the general public attached most importance to price (Pearson’s R = .987, p = .000). The preference in levels by attribute was highest for processed flowers in material, less than 30,000 won in price, hair in wearing area, and 12–24 hours in wearing time. Conclusion By making flower jewelry based on the results of the analysis, it would be possible to help increase items sold in flower shops as well as their income
Advertising · Biology · Business · Conjoint analysis · Preference · Statistics · Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior · Cultural and Historical Studies · Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research · Mathematics · Horticulture
| Highly cited | No |
|---|