Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multisemiotic Patterns of Emotive Meaning-Making in Film

Bibliographic Data

ID22352001
AuthorsTetiana Krysanova (0000-0002-9456-3845, Center for Applied Linguistics), Iryna Shevchenko (0000-0001-8188-3551), Tetiana A Krysanova, Iryna S Shevchenko
Year2022
Volume2
Issue24
Pages238-248
Publication date2022-12-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Philoligy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2523-4463 • E-ISSN: 2523-4749
PublisherAlfred Nobel University (PUBLISHER • UA)
DOI10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-20
OpenAlexW4313465583
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited14

The aim of the article is to highlight multisemiotic patterns of emotive meaning making in feature films. The research tasks are: to explore the meaning-making mechanism in a cognitive-pragmatic perspective; to determine the cognitive-semiotic basics of emotive meaning making; and to identify the meaning-making potential of semiotic resources as well as to single out multisemiotic constructive patterns. To reach the aim, we apply an integrative cognitive-pragmatic and cognitive-semiotic approach, which requires the use of discursive and semiotic research methods. In cognitive-pragmatic perspective, we stress the intersubjective interaction of filmmakers and viewers in constructing ‘meaning-in-context’. The cognitive-semiotic vantage point emphasizes dynamic, enactive, and embodied character of meaningmaking in cinematic discourse. Film is a multimodal and multisemiotic phenomenon, where a synergistic combination of verbal, nonverbal, and cinematic semiotic systems constructs the film meaning through audial and visual modes. These semiotically heterogeneous resources – a verbal language, an image, and specific cinematic signs – are blended to construct emotive meaning; and the configurations of these signs determine particular contextual properties of emotions. In film, emotive meaning emerges at the intersection of audial and visual modes as realized by different semiotic resources. Each semiotic resource contains specific meaningful elements characteristic of a certain semiotic resource. Building on the theory of conceptual integration, we claim that emotive meaning in cinematic discourse is a blend constructed by cross-mapping of information from three input spaces corresponding to verbal, nonverbal, and cinematic semiotic resources. The number of blends can be countless as the process of meaningmaking is dynamic and depends upon the communicative situation. The change of any semiotic element may cause the construction of a new meaning demonstrating the emergent character of meaning-making. In semiotic and pragmatic perspectives, we have singled out the combination of semiotic resources along two main criteria: static and dynamic. The static criterion enables to distinguish patterns by parameters of quantity of semiotic resources in a shot, the quality of emotion in each resource, and their salience in film. The dynamic criterion makes it possible to single out the time patterns due to the appearance of each resource on the screen. Accordingly, we argue that there are eight multimodal patterns of semiotic resource configurations, which construct the emotive meaning in cinematic discourse: three-component and two-component, convergent and divergent, parity and non-parity, and synchronous and consecutive patterns. These patterns demonstrate the paradigmatic regulations of combining semiotic resources in cinematic discourse. The peculiarities of emotive meaning-making are illustrated based on the material of the construction of anger in the American drama film “The Beautiful Boy”. Emotive meaning-making in film occurs in two dimensions: material-perceptual and socio-semiotic, as the emotive meaning can be represented physically on the screen, as well as through the implementation of socio-cultural values

Cognition · Cognitive science · Conceptual Blending · Emotive · Epistemology · Linguistics · Meaning-making · Psychotherapist · Semiotics · Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices

  • Language-specific means of actualization of cognitive-pragmatic potential of evaluation

    Open Access•Ganna Prihodko•Cognition communication discourse•2025

  • Translation as gestalt

    Open Access•Alla Martynyuk, Dinara Huliieva•Cognition communication discourse•2025

  • Projecting a Camera

    Edward Branigan•Projecting a Camera•2013

  • The Psychology of Emotions

    Open Access•Carroll E Izard•The Psychology of Emotions•1991

  • Introducing Social Semiotics

    T Van Leeuwen•Social Semiotics•2004

  • Multimodality

    Gunther Kress, Gunther R Kress•Multimodality•2009

  • Acting Emotions

    Elly A Konijn, Elly' Konijn et al.•Acting Emotions•2000

  • The multimodal representation of emotion in film

    Open Access•Feng William Dezheng, Dezheng Feng et al.•Semiotica•2013

  • Quo vadis pragmatics? From adaptation to participatory sense-making

    Open Access•Ad Foolen•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae