Many Voices, One Project

In architecture and related design fields, there is a perception that community participation in design requires a compromise with aesthetic quality. Alternatively, community-built design (the practice of involving local residents in the design and construction of places) values both participation and aesthetics. Community-built practitioners value aesthetic quality because it instills a sense of pride in the project that in turn strengthens the connections between people and the place involved; it builds community. A qualitative analysis of articles written by and about community-built artists and designers illustrates how their processes work to respect the contributions of all participants while, at the same time, producing artful design solutions. Practitioners utilize a form of structured openness in their projects, processes, and roles. Communitybuilt practices suggest that designers in fields such as architecture, landscape architecture, and urban design, should not think of participation and aesthetics as trade-offs but, instead, consider participation as an opportunity to bring new ideas into their work and to develop an aesthetic that reflects the richness and complexity of the participatory process

Aesthetics · Art · Built environment · Citizen journalism · Civil engineering · Compromise · Openness to experience · Participatory design · Perception · Political science · Pride · Public relations · Sense of community · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Community Health and Development · Engineering · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology · Architecture

• Social Design and Neocolonialism

  Cinnamon L Janzer, Lauren S Weinstein•Design and Culture•2014

  Add to list