Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Regulatory Gaps in Digital Witness Protection for Cybercrime

Integrating International Standards, Egyptian Law, and Islamic Jurisprudence

Bibliographic Data

ID22353188
AuthorsTarek El Sayed Mahmod Tarek El Sayed Mahmod, Tarek El Sayed Mahmod (University of Al Maarif), Khalid awad hammadi Al –Alwani Khalid awad hammadi Al –Alwani, Khalid Awad Hammadi Al-Alwani (University of Al Maarif), Ismael Hellawss Ismael Hellawss, Ismael Hellawss (University Of Fallujah), Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh, Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh (0009-0002-7153-2496, University of Kirkuk), Salah Ragab Fathelbab Salah Ragab Fathelbab, Salah Ragab Fathelbab (University of Al Maarif)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue1
Pages158-192
Publication date2026-04-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAl-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2548-3374 • E-ISSN: 2548-3382
PublisherIAIN Curup (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.29240/jhi.v11i1.16326
OpenAlexW7161963458
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This study examines regulatory gaps in digital witness protection in cybercrime by analyzing the relationship between international standards, Egyptian law, and Islamic jurisprudence. The increasing use of digital testimony in cybercrime cases has not been matched by adequate legal protection, exposing witnesses to risks such as cyber intimidation, data leakage, and cross border retaliation. This study aims to identify these gaps and develop an integrated legal approach that strengthens witness protection while maintaining the integrity of criminal justice. The research applies a normative juridical approach supported by descriptive, analytical, and comparative methods. It analyzes the United Nations Convention on Cybercrime, Egyptian legislation on information technology crimes, and Islamic legal principles related to testimony and protection. The findings show that international standards provide relatively comprehensive protection through mechanisms such as anonymity, remote testimony, and relocation. In contrast, Egyptian law lacks specific provisions addressing digital risks, particularly in relation to technical safeguards, remote protection mechanisms, and international cooperation. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, witness protection is closely linked to the objectives of Sharia, especially the protection of life, dignity, and property, as well as the obligation to ensure truthful testimony without coercion. These principles provide a strong normative basis for adopting modern protection mechanisms, including digital anonymization and remote testimony. The study concludes that addressing regulatory gaps requires the integration of international standards with national legislation supported by Sharia based principles. It proposes a comprehensive model of digital witness protection that combines legal, technological, and ethical safeguards to enhance witness security, strengthen legal certainty, and improve the effectiveness of cybercrime enforcement in transnational contexts

Cybercrime · Data Protection Act 1998 · Islam · Legislation · Normative · Obligation · Sharia · Witness · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Governance, Compliance, and Sustainability · War, Law, and Justice

  • Electronic Signatures in Saudi Arabia's Contemporary Digital Era

    Open Access•Hajed A Alotaibi, Hajed A Alotaibi Hajed A Alotaibi et al.•MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae