Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Routine politics of production in post-Fordist manufacturing

Bibliographic Data

ID22356458
AuthorsMatt Vidal (0000-0001-7189-7482, Loughborough University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume2
Issue1
Pages63-87
Publication date2022-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWork in the Global Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2732-4176 • E-ISSN: 2732-4176
PublisherBristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/273241721x16516689415955
OpenAlexW4283770139
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited32

This article presents a theory of routine politics of production, which was inductively developed based on a case study of 22 supplier factories in the USA, including in-depth interviews with 31 managers and 52 workers. All factories had implemented lean production. The findings show that (i) some managers prioritise the qualitative upgrading of organisational capabilities over quantitative work intensification, (ii) this includes objective forms of worker empowerment, and (iii) many workers resist or are hesitant about these forms of empowerment (while being committed to their work). The majority of workers from this convenience sample described either no work intensification under lean or ‘positive intensification’, which by their own assessment reduces monotony and/or makes the work more challenging. The first necessary condition for routine politics of production to obtain is that managers prioritise qualitative upgrading over quantitative effort levels. The second necessary condition is worker reticence or resistance toward managerial attempts to change routines. The article eschews theories of control and consent in favour of a classical Marxist framework emphasising labour process contradictions. Managers face conflicting pressures between deskilling and upskilling labour. Workers develop a contradictory orientation of alienated commitment. They are committed to being productive workers, in an attempt to realise a purpose in response to their alienation. Yet, in another manifestation of their alienation, experiences of bad management result in scepticism toward management. They embrace their work and Fordist conceptions of efficiency, wanting to see their organisation succeed, yet they contest managerial attempts to upgrade routines, which they deem inefficient

Alienation · Business · CONTEST · Deskilling · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Fordism · Lean manufacturing · Market economy · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Management and Organizational Studies · Marketing

  • From Labour Process Theory to Organisational Political Economy

    Open Access•Matt Vidal•Critical Sociology•2024

  • Contested terrain

    Richard Edwards•Contested terrain•1979

  • Constructing social research

    Charles C Ragin•Constructing social research•1994

  • The development of the labour process in capitalist societies

    Craig R Littler•The development of the labour…•1982

  • Bureaucracy and the labor process

    Dan Clawson•Bureaucracy and the labor process•1980

  • Work and Exploitation in Capitalism

    Matt Vidal•The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx•2018

  • Manufacturing Consent

    M Burawoy•Manufacturing Consent•1982

  • Dignity at Work

    Open Access•Randy Hodson•Dignity at Work•2001

  • Grundrisse

    Karl Marx•Readings in Economic Sociology•2002

  • Labor and Monopoly Capital

    Harry Braverman•Monthly Review•1974

  • Beyond technological determinism

    Paul Thompson, Knut Laaser•Work in the Global Economy•2021

  • Management Divided

    Matt Vidal•Management Divided•2022

  • Contradictions of the Labour Process, Worker Empowerment and Capitalist Inefficiency

    Open Access•Matt Vidal•Historical Materialism•2019

  • All they lack is a chain’

    Open Access•Bob Carter, Bob S Carter et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2011

  • Taxing Times

    Open Access•Bob Carter, Bob S Carter et al.•Public Administration•2013

  • Braverman and the Class Struggle

    Michael D Yates•Monthly Review•1999

  • The Nature of Work

    Open Access•Paul Thompson•The Nature of Work•1983

  • Work Values and Job Rewards

    A L Kalleberg•American Sociological Review•1977

  • Marx, Machines, and Skill

    Paul S Adler•Technology and Culture•1990

  • Voting for Ford

    Open Access•P Cressey, John Macinnes•Capital & Class•1980

  • Valorisation and 'Deskilling

    Open Access•Tony Elger•Capital & Class•1979

  • Lean Enough

    Open Access•Matt Vidal•Socius Sociological Research for…•2017

  • Stressed out of my box

    Open Access•Bob Carter, Bob S Carter et al.•Work Employment and Society•2013

  • Managerial control and workplace regimes

    Open Access•Paul Thompson, Diane Van Den Broek•Work Employment and Society•2010

  • Disconnected Capitalism

    Open Access•Paul Thompson•Work Employment and Society•2003

  • Labour Power and Labour Process

    Open Access•Paul Thompson, Chris Smith•Sociology•2009

  • The Extended Case Method

    Open Access•M Burawoy•Sociological Theory•1998

  • Industry and Labour

    Open Access•Andrew L Friedman•Industry and Labour•1977

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae