Female genital mutilation/cutting as a ground for asylum in France
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22360205 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuko Sonobe (0000-0002-0305-9775, Kagawa University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 171-185 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Japanese Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2769-1365 • E-ISSN: 2769-1357 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ijjs.12153 |
| OpenAlex | W4386461216 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 25 |
This study examines how France's national asylum legislation has changed politically and ideologically from following a gender‐blind policy to recognizing gender‐based violence as a ground for asylum. Among European countries, France receives the largest number of female asylum seekers (FAS) from sub‐Saharan African (SSA) countries, where female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is practiced. Although France was one of the first countries to recognize FGM/C as a reason for granting asylum, it was reluctant to accept FAS as a “particular social group (PSG).” This article analyzes the increase in asylum claims based on FGM/C in the 2000s and examines the political discourses on changing asylum legislation up to the 2010s. Data from official reports of government organizations were examined to investigate the decisions on asylum applications involving FGM/C. France changed its policies in the 2000s to include gender equality in its republican identity due to ultra‐right party and social campaigns criticizing male members of minority groups for violence and discrimination against women. The then conservative government exploited these circumstances and enacted restrictive immigration laws that addressed FGM/C grievances partially; the succeeding socialist government recognized FGM/C as a ground for asylum. This study concludes by arguing that the 2011 European directive was a turning point for French asylum legislation to include gender‐sensitive interpretation of the grounds under the Convention on the Status of Refugees, in line with European policy. However, the status of SSA women and girls remains uncertain while they are subjected to medical examination and the application range of PSG could be reconsidered
Asylum seeker · Convention · Female circumcision · Immigration · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Sociology · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Medicine · Migration, Identity, and Health
L’immigration familiale
Sexual Violence as the Language of Border Control
When female circumcision comes to the West
Gender in Refugee Law. From the Margins to the Centre
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting as a Ground for Asylum in Europe
Protéger et réprimer
Toward a Gender-Sensitive Securitization of the Common European Asylum System
How experiences and attitudes relating to female circumcision vary according to age on arrival in Britain
Save the Muslim Woman, Save the Republic
Migrating with Special Needs? Projections of Flows of Migrant Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Toward Europe 2016–2030
National Identities and Transnational Intimacies
Gender, right-wing populism, and immigrant integration policies in France, 1989–2012
Du retournement de l’asile (1948-2008) à la xénophobie de gouvernement
From 'saving women' to 'saving gays
Lutter contre l'excision
Cause des femmes vs cause des minorités
Engendering Redistribution, Recognition, and Representation
Women, the Law, and Cultural Relativism in France
Producing victim identities
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |