Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Integrating Islamic Principles with Modern Legal Frameworks

Addressing Children’s Origin in Religious Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID22361320
AuthorsDwanda Julisa Sistyawan (0009-0007-5431-9710, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia), Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti (0000-0003-4503-5859, Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya), Harmono Harmono (Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati), Loso Judijanto (0009-0007-7766-0647), Dina Imam Supaat (0000-0003-3063-6440, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia)
Year2025
Volume4
Issue1
Pages111-140
Publication date2025-06-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2829-8373 • E-ISSN: 2829-8624
PublisherUniversitas Negeri Semarang (PUBLISHER • ID)
DOI10.15294/ciils.v4i1.20639
OpenAlexW4416064660
LanguageEN

This study investigates the legal complexities in determining the status of children born out of wedlock within the framework of Islamic family law, focusing on cases adjudicated by the Temanggung Religious Court. The research is driven by the increasing number of disputes related to birth records, the evidentiary role of DNA testing, and the legal implications for children's civil status and inheritance rights. Employing a normative legal research method, this study analyzes statutory regulations, authoritative legal literature, and selected court decisions to evaluate how legal norms are applied in actual case resolutions. The study aims to explore several critical issues: the implications of different birth records, the role of DNA testing in establishing paternity, and the legal recognition of children born out of wedlock in Islamic family law. Findings indicate that DNA testing has emerged as a pivotal tool in confirming biological paternity, thereby providing legal certainty and safeguarding children's inheritance rights. However, inconsistencies in birth record documentation often result in ambiguity and pose challenges in determining legal parentage. The jurisprudence of the Temanggung Religious Court demonstrates varied approaches, reflecting both the rigidity and adaptability of current legal interpretations in reconciling religious doctrine with scientific evidence. The study concludes that despite the availability of scientific methods, the absence of uniform legal standards contributes to inconsistencies in the protection of children's rights. Legal reform is therefore necessary to harmonize Islamic legal principles with modern evidentiary practices. Strengthening procedural clarity and integrating scientific proof within religious adjudication frameworks will promote a more equitable and rights-based approach in family law, particularly in matters of parentage and inheritance

Adjudication · Ambiguity · CLARITY · Doctrine · Empirical legal studies · Jurisprudence · Legal doctrine · Legal pluralism · Legal research · Safeguarding · Gender and Women's Rights · Marriage and Family Dynamics · Qur’anic Interpretation Studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae