Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Position of Choice of Forum and Alternative Dispute Resolution Principles in Contemporary Sharia-Based Property Dispute

Bibliographic Data

ID22361663
AuthorsAbdul Hakim Pratama (Hasanuddin University), Hasbir Paserangi (Hasanuddin University), Adi Nurhani Mufrih (Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta), Abdul Halim Talli (Universitas Islam Makassar), Mohd Al Adib Samuri (0000-0003-3047-6037, National University of Malaysia), Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri
Year2025
Volume4
Issue1
Pages184-207
Publication date2025-04-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2986-528X • E-ISSN: 2986-528X
PublisherUniversitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10140
OpenAlexW4409912631
LanguageEN

This study explores the legal position and implications of forum selection clauses and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in contemporary sharia-based property disputes. Although statutory regulations have governed the forum for Sharia economic dispute resolution—generally designating Religious Courts or Sharia Arbitration—practical implementation still raises interpretative challenges, particularly in cases involving third parties or property rights. Using a qualitative method with statutory, comparative, and case study approaches, the research reveals that forum choice clauses in sharia contracts are legally valid and binding, as supported by Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2016. However, in practice, disputes involving secondary agreements or third-party claims over property often shift jurisdiction from the Religious Court to the District Court. This occurs especially when the primary issue concerns ownership or property rights tied to sharia-based transactions, such as murabahah, ijarah, or rahn contracts. The findings underscore a dissonance between normative legal frameworks and judicial practice, leading to overlapping authorities and legal uncertainty. The study also identifies a tendency among judges to prioritize the object of dispute (e.g., property or collateral) over the contractual nature, thereby affecting the determination of appropriate forum jurisdiction. This research contributes academically by offering a clearer understanding of how forum selection clauses operate within Indonesia's dual court system and by advocating for a more integrated legal interpretation that aligns Islamic legal principles with national procedural law. Ultimately, it highlights the urgency of harmonizing jurisdictional boundaries to strengthen the enforcement and credibility of sharia economic law in resolving property-related disputes

Alternative dispute resolution · Business · Choice of Law · Conflict of laws · Dispute resolution · Economics · Epistemology · Islam · Law and economics · Political science · Sharia · Theology · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae