Chomsky, and the Chomskyan Tradition vs. Linguistic Anthropology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22369697 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Stanlaw (0000-0002-1185-4197, Illinois State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | OTHER |
| Venue | The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0049 |
| OpenAlex | W3101557866 |
| ISBN | 9781118786093 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
The goals of the Chomskyan tradition in autonomous linguistics, and those of linguistic anthropology, are quite disparate. The entry examines some of the assumptions and practices of Chomskyan formal linguistics, and describes how and why sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology became increasingly more detached from the Chomsky project in the 1960s
Anthropological linguistics · Applied linguistics · Clinical linguistics · Linguistic anthropology · Linguistics · Sociolinguistics · Sociology · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |