The Influence of Health Motivation and Calorie Ending on Preferences for Indulgent Foods
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Cleveland State University, a Communication Studies 3251 , Arizona State University West , 4701 W. Thunderbird Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85069, USA E-mail:, KU School of Business, University of Kansas, 1654 Naismith Drive, Lawrence, KS 66045 |
| ANO | 2019 |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| PERIÓDICO | Journal of Consumer Research |
| ISSN | 0093-5301 |
| E-ISSN | 1537-5277 |
| EDITORA | Routledge (United Kingdom) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jcr/ucz002 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
00909f822c5313a3681fa27b7624706d
|
Resumo
Food and beverage manufacturers now regularly display 'just below' calorie amounts (e.g., 99, 199, 299) in advertisements, presumably to appeal to health-motivated consumers. 'Just below' values are those that fall one or more digits below a round number, most commonly seen as nine-ending numbers. However, although nine-ending prices are known to stimulate purchase intent, it is unclear whether or when nine-ending calorie labeling shapes food preferences. The present research shows that when consumers view indulgent foods with just-below (vs. round-ending) calorie amounts, they exhibit higher consumption intentions, purchase intent, and consumption behavior, yet only if they are high in health motivation. This is due to a tendency for health-motivated consumers to overweigh the leftmost digit in multidigit numbers—a cognitive bias known as the 'level effect.' This bias results in the perception that just-below (vs. round) -ending indulgent foods have relatively fewer calories, decreasing anticipated guilt and increasing consumption intentions and behavior. The superiority of just-below calorie presentation under health motivation is attenuated with the addition of reference intake labeling (i.e., % daily calorie intake values), which equalizes the magnitude of nine- and round-ending calorie indulgent foods.