Male Choice Hypothesis
Shortcomings, Inconsistencies, and Proposed Alternatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22410080 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tobias Wilczkowski (0009-0001-3753-903X, Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archives of Sexual Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0002 • E-ISSN: 1573-2800 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10508-026-03469-3 |
| PMID | 42443701 |
| OpenAlex | W7168188640 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 65 |
The male choice hypothesis proposes that same-sex attractions among heterosexual women evolved primarily for male benefit, reducing the risk of extra-pair paternity and providing additional mating opportunities. However, this theory contains significant flaws. This article critically evaluates the male choice hypothesis, showing that it rests on assumptions about male fitness benefits that are inconsistent with established principles of evolutionary psychology and sexual selection and that it further suffers from internal contradictions and conflicts with the empirical evidence. Analysis shows that support for the hypothesis was inflated by a methodological error in which the unlabeled midpoint of their Likert-type scales was repeatedly treated as an affirmative response. Correction of this error in a reanalysis of the published data demonstrates that the authors’ own findings fail to support the hypothesis. Taken together, these issues demonstrate that the male choice hypothesis is not supported by either theoretical reasoning or the empirical evidence presented in its favor, and thus is unlikely to constitute a viable evolutionary explanation for same-sex attractions among heterosexual women. Finally, alternative evolutionary hypotheses are presented that provide more plausible explanations for same-sex attractions among heterosexual women.
Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Evolutionary psychology · Evolutionary theory · Mate choice · Mating · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Sexual selection · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Who suppresses female sexuality? An examination of support for Islamic veiling in a secular Muslim democracy as a function of sex and offspring sex
Receptivity to sexual invitations from strangers of the opposite gender
The human penis as a semen displacement device
What is Sexual Orientation and Do Women Have One?
Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior
Evidence-Based Survey Design
Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science
From vigilance to violence
Sexual selection under parental choice
A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal
Women's sexual strategies
The Eyes Have It
Sexual Strategies Theory
Sex differences in human mate preferences
Implicit Sexual Cognitions in Women with Ambiphilic Sexual Attractions
Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers
Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group
Fluid Versus Fixed
A New Paradigm for Understanding Women's Sexuality and Sexual Orientation
Bisexuality
The New Genetic Evidence on Same-Gender Sexuality
Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period
The Direct Reproductive Cost of Same-Sex Attraction
Stability and Change in Self-Reported Sexual Orientation Identity in Young People
Mostly Heterosexual and Mostly Gay/Lesbian
From vigilance to violence
Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety
Gender differences in erotic plasticity
Genetic essentialism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|