Recess as a Setting for Child Development

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Physical Activity, Motor Skills and Social–Emotional Functioning

Bibliographic Data

ID22411221
AuthorsJohanna E A Brocken (0000-0002-7557-6915, LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands), Martijn Meeter (0000-0002-5112-6717, LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands), Anne G M De Bruijn (0000-0001-6609-0967, LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands)
Year2026
Volume96
Issue8
Pagese70198-e70198
Publication date2026-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of School Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4391 • E-ISSN: 1746-1561
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/josh.70198
PMID42437659
OpenAlexW7168105250
LanguageEN
References cited72

BACKGROUND: Recess can be beneficial for enhancing physical activity levels, but evidence on broader developmental outcomes remains mixed. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (21 Dutch primary schools, N = 1154 children, mean age = 9.0 years) evaluated a one-year recess intervention. Physical activity behavior was measured using accelerometers and observation. Motor skills were assessed with the Athletic Skills Track, and social-emotional functioning through teacher- and self-reports and observations. Implementation fidelity was monitored. RESULTS: No significant intervention effects were found on physical activity behavior or social-emotional functioning. Motor skills improved for both groups, with greater gains in the control group. Implementation fidelity did not significantly affect results. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Implementing standardized intervention programs may not necessarily produce the intended outcomes, possibly requiring more context-specific strategies. Schools may benefit from practical tools to effectively promote children's physically active play at the playground, considering school- and population-specific characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study refines the evidence on recess-based interventions. The larger gains in motor skills observed in the control group suggest that interventions do not necessarily affect practice as intended, highlighting the importance of considering contextual and methodological factors to better understand what works, for whom, and under which conditions.

Affect (linguistics) · Control (management) · Fidelity · Gross motor skill · Intervention (counseling) · Motor skill · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Children's Physical and Motor Development · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Physical Education and Pedagogy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access