Improving Scientific Literacy Through Enhanced Rigor in the Secondary Science Classroom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22411784 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Delmont (0000-0001-7352-0785, University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA, corresponding author), Weijun Wang (0000-0002-6077-1101, University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA), Tiffany Karalis Noel (0000-0003-1989-1643, University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA), Alexandra Schindel (0000-0001-9736-4342, University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | School Science and Mathematics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-6803 • E-ISSN: 1949-8594 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ssm.70024 |
| OpenAlex | W7153331721 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Recent studies have reported a concerning lack of scientific literacy in American students and adults. This intervention study aimed to uncover factors that improve scientific literacy among secondary school students. Data included 74 students (63.5% female; M age = 16.66 years old, SD = 0.49) from one public high school in Western New York. These students were enrolled in two Advanced Placement (AP) Biology and two AP Environmental Science classes, randomly assigned into the intervention ( n = 38; 51.4%) and control conditions ( n = 36; 48.6%). The Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) was used to assess student scientific literacy scores for both pre‐intervention and post‐intervention. Paired samples t ‐test indicated significant pretest and posttest mean score differences for the participants in the intervention group ( t = −4.063, p p = 0.334). Multiple regression analysis showed that participants in the intervention group received higher posttest scores ( b = 2.944, p = 0.002), compared to those in the control group. Furthermore, the intervention effect on the posttest outcome did not depend on levels of pretest scores. Implications for science education at the secondary level, particularly in the pursuit of widespread scientific literacy, were discussed.
Control (management) · Intervention (counseling) · Literacy · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Test (biology) · Treatment and control groups · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Reading and Literacy Development · Science Education and Pedagogy
Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics
Raising the Bar
Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning
How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power
Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education
Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models
Scientific literacy
Investigating the role of an inquiry-based science lab on students’ scientific literacy
Public acceptance of evolution in the United States, 1985–2020
Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |