I want to hold your hand!
The case against ‘no-touch’ policies in early childhood education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22417570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tamsin Grimmer (0000-0003-3312-6905, Norland College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-09 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Early Years (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0957-5146 • E-ISSN: 1472-4421 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09575146.2026.2685573 |
| OpenAlex | W7164021547 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 54 |
Touch is a key element of social interactions within early childhood and forms part of a relational pedagogy. Children naturally use touch daily and research demonstrates that it is a vital component of child development. Effective educators use touch sensitively and appropriately to support children from hand-holding for safety, to high-fives for praise. However, using touch is not without challenges and in recent years there has been a resurgence of ‘no-touch’ policies in schools and settings. Through the lenses of current literature and research alongside attachment and traditional theory, this literature-based conceptual paper seeks to demonstrate how these policies go against current research and offers an evidence-informed argument to counter them. Arguing that educators have a duty of care acting in loco-parentis, incorporating sensitive and appropriate touch between educators and children in schools and settings strengthens social and emotional bonds, enhances learning and is vital within childhood and essential for human survival.
Child care · Early childhood · Early childhood education · Public policy · Children's Rights and Participation · Early Childhood Education and Development · Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Fostering Students’ Well-Being
Discriminative and Affective Touch
Towards an Ecology of Relations
“Don't touch”
Tactile communication, cooperation, and performance
A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions
Children’s emotion perception in context
Reclaiming relationality in education policy
Proposing a conceptual framework for relational pedagogy
Big and small, girls and boys
Human contact in the classroom
Touch’ in educational and child care settings
The Trouble with Touch? New Insights and Observations on Touch for Social Work and Social Care
Adult Caregivers’ Behavioral Responses to Child Noncompliance in Public Settings
Developing Professional Early Childhood Educators in England and Hungary
Touch and Affect
Touching to connect, explore, and explain
| Highly cited | No |
|---|