Multidimensional Sustainability Performance Measurement in the Banking Industry
A Data‐Driven Grey Decision‐Support Framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22418677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Özcan Işık (0000-0003-2230-8738, Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Sivas Cumhuriyet University Sivas Türkiye), Mohsin Shabir (0000-0002-1315-8654, School of Accounting and Finance Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) Kowloon Hong Kong), Alparslan Oğuz (0000-0003-1920-5674, Department of Office Services and Secretarial, Kemah Vocational School, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Erzincan Türkiye), Okan Alkan (0000-0002-6526-1645, Department of Computer Technologies, Vocational School Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Erzincan Türkiye) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Business Strategy and the Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0964-4733 • E-ISSN: 1099-0836 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bse.71305 |
| OpenAlex | W7168426748 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Given the critical role that banks play in sustainable development through their financial intermediation and capital allocation functions, assessing their sustainability performance has become an increasingly important research issue. In response, this research introduces a data‐driven grey decision‐support framework for assessing multidimensional sustainability performance in the banking industry. Sustainability indicators are systematically identified through text‐mining‐based content analysis of banks' sustainability reports and annual activity reports. The empirical analysis covers nine banks continuously included in the BIST Sustainability Index over the 2020–2024 period. To reflect temporal variability in sustainability disclosures, the assessment is formulated under grey interval numbers. Within this decision‐support framework, Grey LODECI is employed to identify criterion importance, while Grey SWI is utilized to rank bank performance in terms of sustainability. This manuscript also offers useful implications for bank managers, regulators, investors, and sustainability rating agencies by supporting more comprehensive sustainability benchmarking and more informed strategic and regulatory decision‐making.
Benchmarking · Empirical research · Environmental Sustainability Index · Performance measurement · Sustainability · Sustainability organizations · Sustainable development · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Signaling Theory
Theory of the firm
Managing Legitimacy
When More Isn't Better
Trust in Sustainability
Sustainability Practices by the Banking Sector to Support Small Organizations Toward SDG 9
A Multi‐Method Decision Support System for Strategic Prioritization of Technology Investments With National Development Plans for Sustainable Development
Corporate Involvement in the Sustainable Development Goals
Job Market Signaling
The Iron Cage Revisited
| Highly cited | No |
|---|