Merton and Kuhn
The Relationship That Shaped Science Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22420331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shashwat Vidhu Sher (Master of Liberal Arts, Stanford University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 105-136 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1063-6145 • E-ISSN: 1530-9274 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/posc.a.574 |
| OpenAlex | W7128632419 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
This study examines the intellectual and personal relationship between Robert K. Merton and Thomas S. Kuhn, and its lasting influence on the emergence of science studies as a distinct field. While Merton is often positioned as a founder of the sociology of science and Kuhn as the architect of the modern philosophy and history of science, their correspondence and collaborations reveal a deeper and more reciprocal exchange. Drawing on archival sources, including letters, notes, and memoirs, the research demonstrates that Merton and Kuhn’s interactions shaped each other’s academic trajectories in ways often overlooked in standard narratives. Merton’s sociological frameworks helped provide Kuhn with a lens for thinking about scientific communities and norms, while Kuhn’s historical and conceptual innovations, like his articulation of paradigm, redirected Merton’s attention toward new intellectual currents. In particular, their exchanges in the 1970s show a mutual effort to resist being cast as opposites by external commentators. This study concludes that the dialogue between Merton and Kuhn was not incidental but formative, providing a connective tissue that helped establish science studies as an interdisciplinary domain bridging history, philosophy, and sociology of science.
History of science · Philosophy of science · Reciprocal · Science studies · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton · History and Philosophy of Science · Philosophy and History of Science
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
Working Knowledge
The Essential Tension
Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences
Kuhn — The Conservative and Radical Interpretations
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its Significance
Kuhn and the Discovery of Paradigms
Science and the Social Order
Priorities in Scientific Discovery
Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science
Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies
Being There with Thomas Kuhn
Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England
The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science
Mathematical vs. Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science
George Sarton
The Myth of the Kuhnian Revolution
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |